IVF should not be free for anyone on the NHS, there are no shortage of people. If people what IVF then they should pay for it otherwise they can adopt.
Seems to be a waste of money and resources when there are so many children up for adoption these days.
Only a week or two back there were news reports about the lack of people who were adopting and how the government were speeding up the process, making couples have to jump through less hoops to complete the process.
I agree. Its just hard luck. Judging from the answers here not many people think otherwise. I suppose it is possible for a woman to be suffering from severe depression because of inability to conceive but IVF on the NHS is not the answer.
I commented on the post yesterday that not all of us are destined to bring forth children - we had to grin and bear it, it's not for all of us. I don't see that the same-sex argument is any different. Having children is a natural function, not a human right -if you can't have any, you learn to live with it.
No. Whether a couple is hetero or homosexual, I really don't think that NHS money should be spent on helping them to reproduce. Of course it's heartbreaking for a couple not to be able to have children. But not as heartbreaking as seeing a loved one suffer or even die due to want of sufficient funds to treat their illness.
umm its only comparatively recently that successful IVF has been available. Before that (and at a time where there was much more social pressure on women to reproduce) by and large, you lived with it.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.