Mps Have Voted In Favour Of Assisted...
News0 min ago
Doctor Guilty Of Indecent Assualts
http://
This Doctor was struck off in 1991, and yet it has taken 23 years to bring him to justice. If we can't trust Doctors, who can we trust ?
This Doctor was struck off in 1991, and yet it has taken 23 years to bring him to justice. If we can't trust Doctors, who can we trust ?
Answers
1 to 16 of 16
There is a mind set among certain people that, given the circumstance
20:35 Fri 06th Feb 2015
well he is an ex-Doctor actually
crimes such as his make him permanently unfit to practise
I am surprised others did not come forward at the first case in the early nineties. Perhaps they did...
It is indeed a shock to read of this
Our local hospital was rocked by
http://
and that was bad ( and traumatic ) enough
crimes such as his make him permanently unfit to practise
I am surprised others did not come forward at the first case in the early nineties. Perhaps they did...
It is indeed a shock to read of this
Our local hospital was rocked by
http://
and that was bad ( and traumatic ) enough
Judges....surely they're trustworthy......
http://
Nope.
http://
Nope.
There is a mind set among certain people that, given the circumstances, they feel they have a right to behave by ignoring the rules of law, humanity, and common sense that govern the rest of us.
If these people are introduced to a life that allows then to indulge these impulses, then they do so, and honestly believe that it is their entitlement.
Such paths include, but are not limited to - priests, doctors, teachers, politicians, footballers, pop stars ... the list does go on, but these are the walks of life where such people are free to exert their unnatural and undeserved sense of superiority, and when discovered, will genuinely feel amazed and aggrieved that the rest of society is actually not willing to allow them to continue down the lifestyle path that they feel they deserve.
That reaction was plain in this doctor, in Gary Glitter, in the duck-house politician who observed that the public should have no say in how he spent 'his' money - and it will always be so.
The attitude, the behaviour, and the bafflement all go hand in hand, always have and always will.
If these people are introduced to a life that allows then to indulge these impulses, then they do so, and honestly believe that it is their entitlement.
Such paths include, but are not limited to - priests, doctors, teachers, politicians, footballers, pop stars ... the list does go on, but these are the walks of life where such people are free to exert their unnatural and undeserved sense of superiority, and when discovered, will genuinely feel amazed and aggrieved that the rest of society is actually not willing to allow them to continue down the lifestyle path that they feel they deserve.
That reaction was plain in this doctor, in Gary Glitter, in the duck-house politician who observed that the public should have no say in how he spent 'his' money - and it will always be so.
The attitude, the behaviour, and the bafflement all go hand in hand, always have and always will.
Sadly Mikey professions and characters are two different things ( thank goodness, slaughterhouse men etc!) but in this country it was always a matter of respecting a professional regardless. I know of an "event " some years ago where a well known doctor and a man of the cloth were found together in a public toilet, the case didn't go to court as it was thought not to be in the public interest, and so it goes on.
1 to 16 of 16
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.