ChatterBank3 mins ago
Shouldn't This Peaceful Silent March Be Allowed To Take Place Without Violent Opposition?
720 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Gromit - //The EDL never exposed any case that wasn't already under investigation. //
That's because the EDL's raison d'etre is not to behave like caring citizens with a social conscience, it's to play on paranoia and media hysteria and whip people up into race-hating mobs like them.
So, to be fair - they are acting true to form - as appalling as that form is!
That's because the EDL's raison d'etre is not to behave like caring citizens with a social conscience, it's to play on paranoia and media hysteria and whip people up into race-hating mobs like them.
So, to be fair - they are acting true to form - as appalling as that form is!
Naomi - ////So, to be fair - they are acting true to form - as appalling as that form is!//
And to be even fairer, not a word about the form the abusers are acting true to – as appalling as that form is! Sickening! //
I would never defend abusers of any creed or colour for one minute, and I am notr trying to get into the notion of justifying one group over the other.
However - abusers are nasty horrible pondlife types who act on base instincts and carry out their vile assaults as opportunists.
EDL and similar racists spend time planning their activities, banding together, trying to stir up hatred where it needn't be (which is everywhere!) and cloaking it all under a pseudo-umbrella of tearful patriotism and self-righteousness.
I find abusers utterly repellent, and I find racist organisations utterly repellent - but for vastly different reasons - neither deserves oxygen.
And to be even fairer, not a word about the form the abusers are acting true to – as appalling as that form is! Sickening! //
I would never defend abusers of any creed or colour for one minute, and I am notr trying to get into the notion of justifying one group over the other.
However - abusers are nasty horrible pondlife types who act on base instincts and carry out their vile assaults as opportunists.
EDL and similar racists spend time planning their activities, banding together, trying to stir up hatred where it needn't be (which is everywhere!) and cloaking it all under a pseudo-umbrella of tearful patriotism and self-righteousness.
I find abusers utterly repellent, and I find racist organisations utterly repellent - but for vastly different reasons - neither deserves oxygen.
// people like Nick Griffin / Tommy Robinson are acting out of a benevolent need to protect anyone - they are horrible nasty bigoted racists who love stirring up agitation and attracting attention // A.H.
reports of crime are context blind arent they ?
'concernred citizens' fill the pages with malicious reports of crimes to the police which if they are true/valid are not spiked because there is another agenda
having looked Nick Griffin says he reported it all in 2001 - is there any independent report ?
reports of crime are context blind arent they ?
'concernred citizens' fill the pages with malicious reports of crimes to the police which if they are true/valid are not spiked because there is another agenda
having looked Nick Griffin says he reported it all in 2001 - is there any independent report ?
andy-hughes
/// I believe he was a bigoted ignorant racist buffoon whose only interests were his own self-aggrandisement and arrogance. ///
This by ABer's master of insults, he that is always criticising others.
Such persons as hughes make me sick they are always ready to dish out their insults to certain groups and individuals, who have never raped or molested women and children of other races, yet they are quite prepared to defend those that have.
Lets have a level playing field here until you can prove that those who set themselves up to speak for the silent majority, have committed some hideous crime, then spend your time insulting and criticising those that have.
/// AOG - I wonder if you are returning to your thread - to offer your views on some of the views expressed? ///
Satisfied with my views? Well you did ask.
Or have I wasted my time, and my view will be deleted as is the vogue, whenever you appear on the scene.
/// I believe he was a bigoted ignorant racist buffoon whose only interests were his own self-aggrandisement and arrogance. ///
This by ABer's master of insults, he that is always criticising others.
Such persons as hughes make me sick they are always ready to dish out their insults to certain groups and individuals, who have never raped or molested women and children of other races, yet they are quite prepared to defend those that have.
Lets have a level playing field here until you can prove that those who set themselves up to speak for the silent majority, have committed some hideous crime, then spend your time insulting and criticising those that have.
/// AOG - I wonder if you are returning to your thread - to offer your views on some of the views expressed? ///
Satisfied with my views? Well you did ask.
Or have I wasted my time, and my view will be deleted as is the vogue, whenever you appear on the scene.
AOG - //Such persons as hughes make me sick they are always ready to dish out their insults to certain groups and individuals, who have never raped or molested women and children of other races, yet they are quite prepared to defend those that have. //
Point one, please don't call me Hughes - you know the reasons why, so I won't waste everyone's time by repeating them.
Secondly - I take strong exception to your observation that I am prepared to defend any perpetrators of abuse of any kind. If you can find any evidence of my defence of such people, please give me a link - but let me save you the time, there is none.
// Lets have a level playing field here until you can prove that those who set themselves up to speak for the silent majority, have committed some hideous crime, then spend your time insulting and criticising those that have. //
I will express my views about whom I wish - as do you, and as you are keen to point out with your 'I don't need the likes of you ...' tirades. I don't need it either!
/// AOG - I wonder if you are returning to your thread - to offer your views on some of the views expressed? ///
Satisfied with my views? Well you did ask. //
Satisfied with your views? They are more of a personal attack - again, which gets rather tedious, but that is what debate is about - when you can stick to it anyway.
// Or have I wasted my time, and my view will be deleted as is the vogue, whenever you appear on the scene. //
Only you know if you have wasted your time. If a Moderator decides that your personal attack is inappropriate, then your post may be deleted - it's not a matter of me 'appearing on the scene' - I am not the only Moderator on the site - just the only one you have issues with.
Point one, please don't call me Hughes - you know the reasons why, so I won't waste everyone's time by repeating them.
Secondly - I take strong exception to your observation that I am prepared to defend any perpetrators of abuse of any kind. If you can find any evidence of my defence of such people, please give me a link - but let me save you the time, there is none.
// Lets have a level playing field here until you can prove that those who set themselves up to speak for the silent majority, have committed some hideous crime, then spend your time insulting and criticising those that have. //
I will express my views about whom I wish - as do you, and as you are keen to point out with your 'I don't need the likes of you ...' tirades. I don't need it either!
/// AOG - I wonder if you are returning to your thread - to offer your views on some of the views expressed? ///
Satisfied with my views? Well you did ask. //
Satisfied with your views? They are more of a personal attack - again, which gets rather tedious, but that is what debate is about - when you can stick to it anyway.
// Or have I wasted my time, and my view will be deleted as is the vogue, whenever you appear on the scene. //
Only you know if you have wasted your time. If a Moderator decides that your personal attack is inappropriate, then your post may be deleted - it's not a matter of me 'appearing on the scene' - I am not the only Moderator on the site - just the only one you have issues with.
sp1814 - //Oh and andy-hughes...a little apology from me...
For the past year or so, I've been referring to your name incorrectly.
For some reason, I thought you were andy_hughes, whereas in fact, you're andy-hughes.
I only realised this the other day. //
Absolutely no need to apologise, but thank you anyway.
For the past year or so, I've been referring to your name incorrectly.
For some reason, I thought you were andy_hughes, whereas in fact, you're andy-hughes.
I only realised this the other day. //
Absolutely no need to apologise, but thank you anyway.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.