ChatterBank5 mins ago
Should Jack Shepherd Have Even Been Charged With Manslaughter, When It Seems That Miss Brown Died From What Was After All, A Tragic Accident?
21 Answers
https:/
/// Shepherd is getting legal aid to fund an appeal against his conviction for the manslaughter by gross negligence of Miss Brown, who died after his defective speedboat capsized on the River Thames on their first date in December 2015. ///
/// Shepherd is getting legal aid to fund an appeal against his conviction for the manslaughter by gross negligence of Miss Brown, who died after his defective speedboat capsized on the River Thames on their first date in December 2015. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"That could have happened regardless of who was driving, if or not they were drunk..."
But it would not have happened had he not taken to the water when, by all accounts, both of them were considerably the worse for wear. It was his boat and he had access to it. Miss Brown did not initiate the event and that's where the negligence began.
This really demonstrates that it is usually unwise to take issue with decisions made in criminal courts. A lengthy trial was held which exposed the facts before a jury. We read a few snippets in the papers and think we have the whole story. We don't, as both this and the David Duckenfield case demonstrate.
Apparently Mr Shepherd's appeal will centre around the fact that he did not receive a fair trial and the judge misdirected the jury. Of course if he had been there he might have been able to avoid that.
But it would not have happened had he not taken to the water when, by all accounts, both of them were considerably the worse for wear. It was his boat and he had access to it. Miss Brown did not initiate the event and that's where the negligence began.
This really demonstrates that it is usually unwise to take issue with decisions made in criminal courts. A lengthy trial was held which exposed the facts before a jury. We read a few snippets in the papers and think we have the whole story. We don't, as both this and the David Duckenfield case demonstrate.
Apparently Mr Shepherd's appeal will centre around the fact that he did not receive a fair trial and the judge misdirected the jury. Of course if he had been there he might have been able to avoid that.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.