ChatterBank1 min ago
Southend Bye Election
21 Answers
I am quite disgusted to see that 8 other candidates are standing. David Amess was killed by a terrorist and by not allowing his seat to remain Conservative they are furthering that scum bags purpose. Common decency alone should prevail
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by CrapAtCryptics. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well the death of an MP leaves a vacancy!
So that’s a pretty good reason.
On balance I think that what is happening is fair enough. No opposition candidate with a remote change of winning is standing and it allows responsible and decent people to make a gesture futile as it might be against the sort of thing that happened - yet again sadly; (all parties have had at least one MP attacker while “on duty” in recent years.
There are circumstances where not having an election would be genuinely problematic for example were the previous MP was say an independent.
So that’s a pretty good reason.
On balance I think that what is happening is fair enough. No opposition candidate with a remote change of winning is standing and it allows responsible and decent people to make a gesture futile as it might be against the sort of thing that happened - yet again sadly; (all parties have had at least one MP attacker while “on duty” in recent years.
There are circumstances where not having an election would be genuinely problematic for example were the previous MP was say an independent.
The vacancy is for an MP after one who happened to be a Conservative was murdered and as you can tell I’ve no problem with another Conservative taking their place, whether unopposed, practically unopposed as here or even “selected”.
But I think the last option is the least good, partly for the reason I mentioned above: you’d probably have to make it a rule and it would only work in certain cases. Even if most of the time that might apply as here. And I’m not sure we really want a rule about what to do in the still thankfully rare case where an MP is murdered. Best to let events take their course as here
But I think the last option is the least good, partly for the reason I mentioned above: you’d probably have to make it a rule and it would only work in certain cases. Even if most of the time that might apply as here. And I’m not sure we really want a rule about what to do in the still thankfully rare case where an MP is murdered. Best to let events take their course as here
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.