Quizzes & Puzzles8 mins ago
Sports Commentators
12 Answers
Why is it when you listen to the commentators on such sports Rugby,Cricket etc in this country they have very good thorough understanding & know their sport inside out(which i love), yet when you listen to commentators on football they havent really got a clue? they talk absolute rubbish(with the exception of guillem balague & graham hunter on the spanish football on sky).. Does anyone else find this? I am a football fan mainly but i have noticed this over the years
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by chrisuk013. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.So-called “commentators” on many sports do not provide commentary at all. They simply prattle on about everything and anything that takes their fancy just to pass the time. I was watching some skiing last week and the two commentators (why do they need two anyway?) were busy chatting away about a competition that took place two or three years ago. They had not noticed that the latest competitor had taken a bad tumble, been caught up in the safety netting and seemed as if she may have been badly hurt. She had come to a complete stop and some of the safety staff had already reached her when the “commentators” realised what had happened and said “Oh dear, she seems to have made a mistake there!”
By contrast, the most competent and knowledgeable commentator on any sport in my view is Formula One’s Martin Brundle.
By contrast, the most competent and knowledgeable commentator on any sport in my view is Formula One’s Martin Brundle.
-- answer removed --
//By contrast, the most competent and knowledgeable commentator on any sport in my view is Formula One’s Martin Brundle. //
I quite agree - although he did ( i dont know if he still does ) on occasions get a bit too technical on occasions for the ordinary joe , i suspect .
Snooker commentators really impresses me - they always know what is the best shot to take and 99.9 % of the time what they say, is the shot that the player takes .
I quite agree - although he did ( i dont know if he still does ) on occasions get a bit too technical on occasions for the ordinary joe , i suspect .
Snooker commentators really impresses me - they always know what is the best shot to take and 99.9 % of the time what they say, is the shot that the player takes .
A lot of cricket and racing commentators were journalists before moving into TV and radio - but a lot of football pundits are ex=players
i would not suggest that an ex sportsperson does not make a good TV presenter, as obviously there are examples, but there are nore examples of players who don't - Lawrensen and Sheerer being prime examples as bad choices, but Lineker is excellent.
The rule should be - pick a presenter / pundit for who they perform nowon TV, not how they performed then on the pitch.
i would not suggest that an ex sportsperson does not make a good TV presenter, as obviously there are examples, but there are nore examples of players who don't - Lawrensen and Sheerer being prime examples as bad choices, but Lineker is excellent.
The rule should be - pick a presenter / pundit for who they perform nowon TV, not how they performed then on the pitch.