ChatterBank1 min ago
Dr John Lee Writing In The Spectator On Coronavirus.
Interesting article providing an alternative view.
https:/ /www.sp ectator .co.uk/ article /The-ev idence- on-Covi d-19-is -not-as -clear- as-we-t hink
I found the points he was making pretty compelling.
Thoughts?
https:/
I found the points he was making pretty compelling.
Thoughts?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Deskdiary. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I haven't read the whole article but stopped at his first factual error...that people with serious illnesses who die have the death recorded soley as the result of the serious illness. I know from my own husband's death certificate, also from my mother in law's death certificate, that this is not true. Simple basic factual error.
The article is extremely thought provoking and reflects what I've been questioning over the past few days. How many people have already had the virus and not contacted any health professionals as they managed at home? Only those really sick are admitted to hospital and of these only a small percent are dying, usually because they have had underlying conditions. Statistics cannot be taken seriously if they are only taking into account those sick enough to warrant a test, or admittance to the ICU
He writes ‘At the time of writing, the UK’s 422 deaths and 8,077 known cases give an apparent death rate of 5 per cent.’ That would only be true if you could say with some degree of certainty that all those within that total who hadn’t already died would recover. The reality is that all you could actually say from that information is that a death rate of 5 per cent would be the best outcome you could hope for.
I do agree that we don’t have enough information to trust any figures other than the numbers who have died, and perhaps many of them were critically ill at the time.
I do agree that we don’t have enough information to trust any figures other than the numbers who have died, and perhaps many of them were critically ill at the time.
1500 deaths in the UK in the first 6 weeks.
Which is less than we would expect from regular flu.
So on those stats, the precautions appear to be overkill.
The difference is that no vaccine is available to stop the spread.
I hope the curtailment of our freedoms is a precaution worth making. Only time will tell if it was/is an over reaction. It would be a brave or very stupid (looking at Trump) leader who did nothing.
Which is less than we would expect from regular flu.
So on those stats, the precautions appear to be overkill.
The difference is that no vaccine is available to stop the spread.
I hope the curtailment of our freedoms is a precaution worth making. Only time will tell if it was/is an over reaction. It would be a brave or very stupid (looking at Trump) leader who did nothing.
// Dr John Lee makes more sense than the alarmist government / science warnings and authoritarian policies that are taking away our freedoms.// Theeley
erm hasnt all this been said before
I mean - - - prophesied
yup Book of Revelations
the bit about "and there will rise up false prophets"
yeah dis
24False messiahs and false prophets will arise, and they will perform signs and wonders so great as to deceive, if that were possible, even the elect.
maffew den
erm hasnt all this been said before
I mean - - - prophesied
yup Book of Revelations
the bit about "and there will rise up false prophets"
yeah dis
24False messiahs and false prophets will arise, and they will perform signs and wonders so great as to deceive, if that were possible, even the elect.
maffew den
// my statement regarding what is written on death certificates is not anecdotal.//
um if he is saying - this thread is not clear for the main reason I havent waded froo all the answers -
that analysis of death certificates are a truly crap was of analysing causes of death because they are the subjective opinions of the persons certifying
then he is right
but that is not important right now is it? the hospitals are full of old people dying from a lung disease ( and NOT old muvva hubbards dementia ) - and that is unmistakeable if you go down to one
this is the oxford dept;s idea of "epidemic what epidemic?"
and is refuted by looking out of the window
solvitur visu ex fenestra baby
(it is solved by looking oudda a window - sozza reader - zeno's paradox on the impossibility of movement was - "solved by walking" - solvitur ambulando - oh videndo and not visu)
and what do you see if you do ( look out of the Yard? monty python this time) = dead bodies lots of dead bodies
um if he is saying - this thread is not clear for the main reason I havent waded froo all the answers -
that analysis of death certificates are a truly crap was of analysing causes of death because they are the subjective opinions of the persons certifying
then he is right
but that is not important right now is it? the hospitals are full of old people dying from a lung disease ( and NOT old muvva hubbards dementia ) - and that is unmistakeable if you go down to one
this is the oxford dept;s idea of "epidemic what epidemic?"
and is refuted by looking out of the window
solvitur visu ex fenestra baby
(it is solved by looking oudda a window - sozza reader - zeno's paradox on the impossibility of movement was - "solved by walking" - solvitur ambulando - oh videndo and not visu)
and what do you see if you do ( look out of the Yard? monty python this time) = dead bodies lots of dead bodies
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.