ChatterBank0 min ago
can't they were dying 'cus they weren't!
24 Answers
does anyone else find this odd?
I find it strange that we can't say that someone was so ill, or injured that they were 'dying' if they then go on to survive.
Do you know what I mean?
In a newspaper report, say of someone in a car crash, they would say (if the person subsequently died) that they lay 'dying' while awaiting help.
BUT, if they go on to survive, no matter how near death they were, it will never say that they were dying.
It's as if simply because they lived, and didn't die, then they couldn't have been dying.
But I think they were dying, almost dead, but managed to survive, so why can't we say they were dying?
I find it strange that we can't say that someone was so ill, or injured that they were 'dying' if they then go on to survive.
Do you know what I mean?
In a newspaper report, say of someone in a car crash, they would say (if the person subsequently died) that they lay 'dying' while awaiting help.
BUT, if they go on to survive, no matter how near death they were, it will never say that they were dying.
It's as if simply because they lived, and didn't die, then they couldn't have been dying.
But I think they were dying, almost dead, but managed to survive, so why can't we say they were dying?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by crisgal. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."But I think they were dying, almost dead, but managed to survive, so why can't we say they were dying?"
I think you "can" say that... but you're equating dying with what's known as "living"! Possibly the philosophers and a metaphysicists union put the squeeze on whoever is stopping you from saying this?
It's a tense issue really.
I think you "can" say that... but you're equating dying with what's known as "living"! Possibly the philosophers and a metaphysicists union put the squeeze on whoever is stopping you from saying this?
It's a tense issue really.
Unless the circumstances are such that death is instantaneous, dying is essentially a 'process' over a period of time. If that process is brought to a halt, I can see no reason why - up until the stop-point - it cannot be referred to as 'dying'. It does not seem relevant that the process did not continue to its expected end.
We are all in the process of dying.
The placebo affect is a powerful aid to physical recovery. Tell a person that they are dying and the % of surviving goes down.
They can only report that a person was laying there dying after that person died, unless they were diagnosed terminal by a proper doctor.
When I was the Secretary of a hobby club, I stopped sending get well cards to seriously ill members. I can't think of any worse for the family than a get well card for someone who's just kicked the bucket.
The placebo affect is a powerful aid to physical recovery. Tell a person that they are dying and the % of surviving goes down.
They can only report that a person was laying there dying after that person died, unless they were diagnosed terminal by a proper doctor.
When I was the Secretary of a hobby club, I stopped sending get well cards to seriously ill members. I can't think of any worse for the family than a get well card for someone who's just kicked the bucket.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.