ChatterBank4 mins ago
Naked Trees.
6 Answers
I don’t know what else to call them.
I’ve seen a few recently on my travels. Some on private property, some by the side of the road.
They have no bark, and no leaves.
The only branches left are the lower, thickest ones, also stripped bare.
I really like them, but don’t have a clue why they’ve ended up like this. Anyone know?
I’ve seen a few recently on my travels. Some on private property, some by the side of the road.
They have no bark, and no leaves.
The only branches left are the lower, thickest ones, also stripped bare.
I really like them, but don’t have a clue why they’ve ended up like this. Anyone know?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bigbad. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Ash dieback is rapidly destroying the whole species across Europe:
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ environ ment/20 19/may/ 06/ash- dieback -expect ed-cost -britis h-econo my-15bn
https:/
Thank you for your answer, Buenchico.
I have now looked up ash dieback, but although the articles describe what to look for, they don’t seem to say whether the affected trees are stripped, like the ones I’ve seen, or chopped down completely.
It;’s certainly a shame if disease is the reason, but I do like the look of them.
I think it’s the starkness that I like.
I have now looked up ash dieback, but although the articles describe what to look for, they don’t seem to say whether the affected trees are stripped, like the ones I’ve seen, or chopped down completely.
It;’s certainly a shame if disease is the reason, but I do like the look of them.
I think it’s the starkness that I like.