Oooh My Christmas Present Just Came
ChatterBank1 min ago
I hope the safeguards around any proposals are as strong as can be.
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.fender: "ToraToraTora, thats canada not the uk, we do not have to follow their example, if framed correctly then it would not happen, emotive subject i know." - their laws are based on ours, every law is challengeable and will be challenged by those that want to change the parameters. Read my 15:08 post.
A wise choice in my opinion. The nay sayers aren't writhing around in untreatable agony. They are not experiencing a loved one crying out for release, from a terminal condition.
Shoving granny into oblivion is a knee jerk response and, yes, there maybe some instances, but, a blessed relief for many. Given time, the wisdom of this decision will become apparent.
15:38 have a day off you wally, I have set out sensible fears of where this might lead. I'd agree with this if the parameters are set and unchangeable. Anyone with an ounce of sense knows that is never the case, so that's you out. Like it or not Canada is very close to the nazi Euthanasia policy right now and that is because of scope creeping legal challenges. Try and think.
I'm very unhappy about this. I remember clearly David Steele (Lib. leader) when he promoted making abortion legal.
It was going to be so closely monitored. 2 doctors would have to assess the woman and the situation........... now see where we are. Hard cases make bad laws.
Yes, I would have welcomed a medic, 'easing' my Bro-in-law's agonising death, but this is too broad and people will be pushed into destroying themselves.
//Shoving granny into oblivion is a knee jerk response//
No it isnt, it happens - see Canada which is a good example despite the oh so clever ones trying to use it to derail.
I am, pro, but we need tight laws and the only way to do that will be to leave the EHCR which neither Tory or Labour are willing to do.
jordain @ 15:44, exactly that.
Atheist, death camps crikey, this is about people actually dying, not mentally ill or physically disabled, iv watched family die of cancer many times sadly, and it was not nice for them or the family to watch, they did not want to linger, this is about the last six months of ones life, i want the choice.
Dear friend of mine has Huntingtons and knows just how it will end. She watched her sister go through this, unable to walk, talk, eat etc and in a wheelchair with 24/7 care. My friend certainly doesn't want to go through this and would welcome assisted dying. If it wasn't for her grandchildren she would have travelled abroad for this.
This is a very dangerous move. What most folk seem unaware of is that we've had it in this counrty in the past with the LCP (Liverpool Care Pathway). I have personal experience of this and I now believe it could have been mis-applied. Not by the relatives, but by the Ward Management seeking to reduce bed-blocking.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.