A lot of questions on vote rigging need answering? Here's the answer then: there wasn't any. The "no" vote was always the most likely to win, despite the increasing volume of "yes" voters. Polls showed that all the way through, so the result should hardly be a surprise.
Actually one of the fun bits of all the vote rigging "scandals" is that 7 of the 10 instances of "scandal" were in Glasgow and Dundee....who voted yes.... go figure
I don't see that there's any reason to be suspicious. The postal vote again is something more likely from the older generation, which was always more against independence; while the surge in "Yes" support only came in early September, after a lot of postal votes had been already sent in. There is no reason to be suspicious.
The "Yes" vote lost. Time to move on, and make togetherness work.
Do you know what I think was really dodgy:
The rooms that the votes were counted in were too big.
That's right: "too big". Imagine that. The cheating b*st*rds to foist that on the poor unsuspecting counters who plainly could not cope with the space such that they missed a lot of Yes votes.
That was one of the complaints of the Russian observers, anyway.