ChatterBank0 min ago
Logical Or What?
17 Answers
I believe that atheists will find john lennox challenging
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Believing the universe and all that is in it is too complex to not have been created by something that would of necessity be inherently infinitely more complex is logically . . . absurd.
Complexity, no less that inherent in the existence of a conscious reasoning creative mind, is a product of evolving means and process.
Complexity, no less that inherent in the existence of a conscious reasoning creative mind, is a product of evolving means and process.
Perhaps I am alone in this, Theland, but I rather enjoyed playing your game of 'Name that Fallacy'. Here's a partial list in the hope that you too can enjoy a session of 'Pin the Tail on the Donkey':
Non-sequitur
Argument from authority
Appeal to ignorance
False dilemma
False equivalence
Cherry picking
Thought-terminating cliché
Straw man
Just to name a . . . few.
Non-sequitur
Argument from authority
Appeal to ignorance
False dilemma
False equivalence
Cherry picking
Thought-terminating cliché
Straw man
Just to name a . . . few.
Still not watched much of it, but I did note his comment relating to Richard Dawkins’ contention that people of religion are deluded. The speaker went on to give the definition of ‘delusion’…..
“A persistent false belief held in the face of very strong contradictory evidence”.
…. and then applied it to atheism.
I want to see his ‘very strong contradictory evidence’. Since Theland thinks this man is logical, perhaps he will be kind enough to provide it.
(I will watch the rest when I have time).
“A persistent false belief held in the face of very strong contradictory evidence”.
…. and then applied it to atheism.
I want to see his ‘very strong contradictory evidence’. Since Theland thinks this man is logical, perhaps he will be kind enough to provide it.
(I will watch the rest when I have time).
I have now slogged through a quarter of an hour of this, during which this preacher claims vigorously that Christ and Christianity reject violence. Absolutely untrue.
Christ said quite clearly " I come not to bring peace but the sword". That is: " NOT peace but rather fighting likely to cause death ".
If that isn't a demand for violence, I don't know what is.
Christ said quite clearly " I come not to bring peace but the sword". That is: " NOT peace but rather fighting likely to cause death ".
If that isn't a demand for violence, I don't know what is.