Some Can Get Away With Anything In This Country.

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5058023/Mother-five-encouraged-terror-attacks-spared-jail.html

/// The Old Bailey heard today Ahmed's five home-schooled children, aged between six and 16, had suffered 'greatly' after she was arrested in July last year and held in custody. ///

Yes that's right judge return her home so that she can continue with the home - schooling of her 5 children, I wonder what will be the top of their curriculum?

I wonder if the powers that be, will appeal against this very dangerous verdict?

[Mamyalynne]

The Court had the full details, the Judge made the ruling, on certain charges the Prosecution showed no evidence.

I'll let those qualified decide.

She was found guilty.

[douglas9401]

Blind justice right enough.

[Spicerack]

She had the taqiyya turned up to 11.

[Gromit]

Interesting case.
This Judge seems sympathetic, and it could have gone another way with a different Judge. But we were not in Court to hear the testimony. She is lucky.

The crime isn’t really that great. The one post that they hightlighted is actually attacking her fellow muslims rather than supporting the Paris attacks.
// So the 'Muslims' in the West wanna have a cry and a moan and condemn and pay and speak out for a handful of Kafir's in France compared to Syria who has had way more killed but their lives do not matter to the 'Muslims' that allay themselves with the West.' //

I wouldn’t use her language, but there is a certain hypocrisy of condemning attacks in France when we were killing Syrians civilians daily.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/08/america-is-bombing-the-hell-out-of-syrian-civilians/

[Spicerack]

What language would you use, gromit?

[andy-hughes]

AOG - // I wonder what will be the top of their curriculum? //

You can't punish someone for what you think they might be teaching their children - we don't have 'thought crime' yet.

[hc4361]

Have you read the full article, AOG, or just the headlines?

[Gromit]

Spicerack
I wouldn’t lecture moderate muslims for condemning the attacks in Paris. But reminding them of the west’s hypocrisy is fair game. That is all she did on that Facebook post. Thatone does not look like a criminal offence, so I don’t know why the newspaper used it.

[naomi24]

// judge said 'the sooner you get back to your children the better'. //

Better for whom? Not for the children that's for sure. Poor judgement, Judge.

[hereIam]

I wonder too aog.

[andy-hughes]

Naomi - // Better for whom? Not for the children that's for sure. Poor judgement, Judge. //

Since the judge knows the case in full detail, and no doubt has access to appropriate social reports and similar information, I would suggest that, even if his judgement is seen to be poor, and that will be seen in the future - his judgement is still likely to be based on considerably better evidence than the evidence you are using to condemn him for it.

[emmie]

naomi, that's what i think too. poor judgement.

[naomi24]

andy-hughes, //his judgement is still likely to be based on considerably better evidence than the evidence you are using to condemn him for it. //

Possibly - but then again he could be a twitty do-gooding berk. Who can say?

[hereIam]

So do I.

[Spicerack]

If you dare suggest that some ABers defend islamist scum, you'll be met with howls of protest, ' Who, what, where, when?' 'Point out 1 post where anyone defends them'.
This is a classic. I must bookmark it.

[hc4361]

If you break it down in to bite sized facts you might see the judge's point of view.

Husband charged with terrorist offences in Turkey.
She was arrested and charged with funding terrorism after she sent him money (twice).
She was prevented from travelling to Turkey to see him.
Husband was acquitted so all charges against her would have been dropped. He returned to the UK.

It was during this period that she breached her bail conditions by posting those comments on social media. She was sent to prison on remand. She has spent 16 months in prison and has now been given a suspended sentence after pleading guilty of posting those comments.

Had she not been wrongly charged with funding terrorism she would not have been in breach of her bail when she posted those comments and would not have spent that time in prison. Would she have received a prison sentence for those FaceBook postings? If so, what would her sentence have been and how long would she served, bearing in mind she pleaded guilty?

[naomi24]

hc, //Would she have received a prison sentence for those FaceBook postings? //

Doubtful - but in my opinion she should have been. I think the time has come to acknowledge that people like her are this country's enemies - and for anyone who supports Islamic terrorism in any way to be removed from our society.

[murraymints]

do the crime ..do the time....

[andy-hughes]

Naomi - //andy-hughes, //his judgement is still likely to be based on considerably better evidence than the evidence you are using to condemn him for it. //

Possibly - but then again he could be a twitty do-gooding berk. Who can say? //

According to your post at 17:06 - // Better for whom? Not for the children that's for sure. Poor judgement, Judge. //

You appear to think that you can say!

Unlike you, I also think he might be a 'twitty do-gooding berk', but I am willing to wait and see, before condemning him in advance with no evidence except a media link - your chosen approach.