OMG why does it matter what people did or didn't do in the past, or who did it - this shouldn't be about posters and their politics it's about the avatar itself as a single entity. I just hope, based on what was rightly or wrongly deemed as an inappropriate image in the past, that Ed reviews it tomorrow with the equal unbiased criteria that have been used in the past (eg if a swastika and a Robertson's golly is a no-no then neither is this).