//"Boxers know the risks involved". Car drivers know the risks involved driving without a seatbelt on but it's still not allowed// Bad analogy. Car drivers run the risk of hurting others, boxers will only ever hurt each other.
Personally I think its barbaric and wouldn't mind seeing it banned....but ....well.....everybody involved is a willing participant, presumably with the mental capacity to decide for themselves?
The fowls are not born with the intelligence of man!
Man chooses to get in the ring and box the fowls do not they are starved and brutalised until they know no difference.
So yes I care more about fowls than man
If two meat heads want to beat the meat out of their heads then let them.
It's no more harmful to society than football and the sportsmen love the sport, so let em do as they wish. They know that when they get in the ring they'll either win, or be knocked out.
Alan Minter: "Sure there have been deaths in boxing but none of them serious"!
I think the occasional death is inevitable in Boxing and other sports too. Ban it outright and it'll go underground with less protection for participants.
Ban it and, as TTT says, it will be driven underground and become far less regulated. The result will be far more deaths and permanent injuries. Boxers - like F1 drivers, mountain climbers, etc - know the risks they take yet are happy to climb into the ring. For some it is a way of escaping the environs in which they live, particularly in the USA, so who are we to deny them that chance?
Maybe, but would it generate the same income without media coverage ? Maybe it'd be a minority viewing and perhaps even die out. Except in foreign countries who didn't ban it.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.