Jules, bones are a vital part of a raw diet, more dogs have died through being fed commercial dog food than ever have died through eating a raw diet and bones.
The problem with research:
The dog food manufacturers have got so much to lose from people going over to raw feeding, (raw feeding is no fad, its taking over in huge numbers) Dog food manufacturers will publish all the biased research they can get their hands on to discredit raw feeding, its in their best interests to save their multi billion £ empires!!
Raw feeding research is not sponsored by our local butcher, he isn’t going to sponsor Raw feeding of any animal, the research is not backed by multi million £ companies. Raw feeding research is done by scientist and by people with a love and passion for their animals.
We were amazed ourselves just how many people are actually feeding Raw, we are now meeting these people at dog shows, in the street and even people we have known for years and have been raw feeding for years, but of course, if its not a particular interest of yours the subject of dog food rarely comes up in conversation.
Even some of the big breeders are switching to raw food, bones and all. All I ever hear from them is great results and not a single horror story.
This is what Purina has to say about raw feeding
http://www.purinaone....34cfe76c8&species=dog
Everything they say is generally true. Meat is low in calcium, that is why we feed bones, high in calcium, Liver can be harmful over a period of time if fed in quantity, agreed, that’s why we don’t do that, we feed only the required amount. In the wild they eat grasses and vegetable matter, again this is tru