ChatterBank0 min ago
Ex Dragons Den Cleared
of under-age sex, but had admitted he had.
Even though she was only16 and agreed for £60, what the hell was he doing with her in the first place, considering he was Cameron's adviser?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-34 23023/F ormer-D ragon-s -Den-st ar-Doug -Richar d-accus ed-havi ng-50-S hades-G rey-sex -13-yea r-old-g irl-CLE ARED-Ol d-Baile y.html
Even though she was only16 and agreed for £60, what the hell was he doing with her in the first place, considering he was Cameron's adviser?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by trt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Pretty clear to me that Talbot meant "Lucky to get away with it". To suggest he meant anything else is quite an insult!
But I think he was more than lucky to get away with it. The jury must have agreed that it was possible to mistake this 5ft, less than 6 stone 13 year old for a 17 year old. From Doug Richard's own evidence, he was meeting young women at least twice a month, and chatting to hundreds of them every day, for 4 years. Both girls in this case were under 16, so how many more were? I don't know how he got away with this.
But I think he was more than lucky to get away with it. The jury must have agreed that it was possible to mistake this 5ft, less than 6 stone 13 year old for a 17 year old. From Doug Richard's own evidence, he was meeting young women at least twice a month, and chatting to hundreds of them every day, for 4 years. Both girls in this case were under 16, so how many more were? I don't know how he got away with this.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.