Back to the "the results of care ( for the child ) are disastrous" post.
Its follow-up:
" In England, children in care are five times more likely to be cautioned or convicted of an offence than children in the general population"
Well, he's making a statistical case which I agree with.
But the broad brush stroke term "vulnerable children in care will be further damaged by the carers" is a stereotypical insult which wouldn't be allowed in other contexts a would be classified as "hate speech".
The qualification "not in all cases" in a subsequent post came a bit late, didn't it?
As well as window cleaner and computer geek I've been a "carer". For three girls, one pubescent and two younger, from my own wife's partly dysfunctional family. The girls had suffered in two cases physical abuse by a step-mother, and worse still in the other sexual abuse, not by the step-father, but by the step-father's father.
AB is over-represented by the great and the good. But I wonder how many of this moral elite has shared my experience.