Whiskas Tins Versus Sachets

[smurfchops]

Are Whiskas tinned cat food more fattening than their pouches?

[ummmm]

I don't think so. I find the pouches are better for portion control though.

[Old_Geezer]

Eat whichever you think tastes nicer.
Pouches are usually plastic so have little in the way of usable calories.

[ummmm]

Very helpful, OG.

[wolf63]

I feed sachets as there seems to be more jelly and that, I am told, is the best bit. I wouldn't worry about the calories - stick whichever one your cat likes.

I feed Whiskas, Felix or Gourmet but I don't manage to serve the correct one all the time. It is then rejected.
:-)

[Buenchico]

I've always thought that, if there's any difference at all, it will be the pouches that contain the more fattening food. Looking at the ingredients, that would seem to be confirmed by the fact that 'various sugars' are present in the pouches but not in the cans.

https://www.whiskas.co.uk/our-products/wet-food

[Theland]

Our 4 cats prefer pouches. Gravy or jelly.
Tins seem to solid and the cats don't seem as enthusiastic.

[ummmm]

I keep telling people in this house to not feed the cat when we have tins, I end up throwing half tins away.

[Theland]

Ummmm, that's one reason we don't buy tins either.