Reasons To Be Cheerful - Part Whatever
ChatterBank0 min ago
Naming & Shaming
47 Answers
How about leaving the name of the poster in situ when a post is removed for being insulting, rude or deemed hurtful and unnecessary. Some Abers might think twice if they were going to be named and shamed.
Just a thought.
Just a thought.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by chrissa1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Ed's house, Ed's rules. Anybody in a similar position, e.g. a pub landlord or a newspaper editor, would apply the same logic.
Otherwise you get into the position where a nasty minority can force the nicer majority to go elsewhere, leaving you with just - or mainly - the nasty minority. There are sites like that, but I guess Ed doesn't want this to be one of them ...
Otherwise you get into the position where a nasty minority can force the nicer majority to go elsewhere, leaving you with just - or mainly - the nasty minority. There are sites like that, but I guess Ed doesn't want this to be one of them ...
-- answer removed --
LOL....
Has anyone really thought this through.
User A starts a thread.
User B posts on it, that post is removed for whatever reason, but the name of user B is left in place.
User A checks back on their thread, sees a post removed from user B so starts hounding user B asking them "what did you say that was removed"
Arguments ensue.
Has anyone really thought this through.
User A starts a thread.
User B posts on it, that post is removed for whatever reason, but the name of user B is left in place.
User A checks back on their thread, sees a post removed from user B so starts hounding user B asking them "what did you say that was removed"
Arguments ensue.
