Donate SIGN UP

New Members

Avatar Image
rockyracoon | 18:16 Tue 15th Nov 2011 | Site Suggestions
44 Answers
Ed is there no way of blocking the IP address of the halfwits that come on here with disgusting user names.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 44rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by rockyracoon. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think Dotty has a new fella.................
whats the idea with the dots jno?
You'd need a trial period first....

If they imposed a no posting for 24 hours rule people would find another site to get their question answered.
just to shift offensive usernames off the Latest Posts panel, ludwig.
@chuck - there is smut (which is a good olde english tradition) and there is gratuitous filth (which is an unpleasant side-effect of the anonymity of the interweb)...

dave xx
(not aka fubbychucker ;))
Ok, gotcha.
surely the dots keep 'em there, jno, if we don't respond at all they will soon fall off.
yeah, but they just offend my eyes, boxy. I'm the sensitive type.
On another forum which I use, the first 5 posts from a new user go to a moderator queue for approval before being posted on the forum.
I think a membership fee would put genuine new people from joining up. This is of course not the only Q&A site so why pay for something when you can get it free somewhere else.

The pre-approval could be a good idea though.
Maybe they should feed new user names through the profanity tester and reject them accordingly.
trolls have tried that - posted a few innocuous comments for 10 minutes before going over to the dark side. I think the system in place now is working pretty well.
yes to ludwig's suggestion, though; user names seem to bypass the swear filters.
It works well as it is. Things like this just happen now and then....we're (mainly) all adults, we've seen and heard worse...
It would at least stop people being able to register with those names though.
You are very quick off the mark, I'm impressed.
How about a new user being allocated a temporary username(*), and that is replaced by their requested username once it has been ok'd. An email would confirm the change.

(*) the temporary username could be a randomly generated combination of common words/syllables so that it looks a bit like a real word and not just a random sequence of letters and numbers. I think AOL used to use this method for generating mailbox names when their '1 month free trial' discs were ubiquitous several years ago.
threads about the halfwits only serve to give them a platform for more high jinks, if everyone ignored them it would be a lot easier, the mods seem to have things ticking over okay.
-- answer removed --
.

21 to 40 of 44rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

New Members

Answer Question >>