He gave a choice - and for a busy man 'ignored' is a good choice. I thought we had been told to post questions about the site here - but it's a bit frustrating when we do, and get no answer, so I think Ron is right to highlight this.
Thanks for your support Ron, but i think Ed is either on holiday (at the Olympics maybe!) or so anti the Olympics that he doesn't want to be dragged into a conversation about it.
There's time yet for him to surprise us on his return with a token bonze medal!
With the best will in the world Ron; if I was Ed and saw a thread from you in suggestions, I'd be likely to just delete or ignore it. You come across a bit dogged sometimes with your posts to Ed, and I'm not sure it does you any favours. Just my take on it.
And no, I don't see why Ed or his/her team have to answer absolutely everything in this section. Especially if it's already been answered or completely off the wall.
Ed, You didn't answer mine. Obviously I didn't expect you to answer the second bit - that was for other people - but it would have been nice to receive a reply to a genuine query.
Ah, good point. I did scribble something down about that... I know there is no limit for subscriptions. The average was difficult to work out previously as the data exporter went a bit wobbly last month (meaning I couldn't export it to excel to find your answer).