Quizzes & Puzzles23 mins ago
I Have Succumbed To The Daily Wail
50 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 65167/H otel-bo sses-re fuse-se ll-fish -finger s-man-4 7-Downs -Syndro me-clai ming-me al-avai lable-1 2s.html
OK Daily Wail spin aside what do you reckon?
OK Daily Wail spin aside what do you reckon?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Barmaid. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I read that and although I agree a bit with the hotel (kids meals are for kids) perhaps there should have been a bit of a compromise.
I don't see the point of running off to the press every time life throws you a bad hand of cards (that's not right).
I get the Daily Mail every day but usually only for the promotions and competitions.
I don't see the point of running off to the press every time life throws you a bad hand of cards (that's not right).
I get the Daily Mail every day but usually only for the promotions and competitions.
Ridiculous that they said it was because of his disability. If I had ordered same I would expect to be told it was ONLY for children...why make an issue of "discrimination" when it was down to the establishment as to what was on the menu and for whom. Methinks some people need not to seek publicity and take people to task for something that was legitimate...IMO. However, they maybe could have given the chap a meal he wanted with no fuss.....no flexibility I think.
Willie Forbes, 47, who visited the Royal Highland Hotel in Inverness for dinner while on holiday with his family, was told the meal - his favourite - was only available to under-12s, his niece claims.
If the above is true.....Willie is 47....Menu is for under 12s...what is the problem?
All you need to do is to send in another 47year old without a disability and if he is allowed to choice from the under 12 menu, then Willie has been discriminated against.
Can't see the problem....
If the above is true.....Willie is 47....Menu is for under 12s...what is the problem?
All you need to do is to send in another 47year old without a disability and if he is allowed to choice from the under 12 menu, then Willie has been discriminated against.
Can't see the problem....
I agree he wasn't discriminated against because of his disability - he was treated the same way any over 12 year old would be.
I do find it frustrating that any eating establishment has this rule, however. Many people for various reasons can't eat a full sized meal or simply prefer 'childrens' food'. Perhaps the answer would be to charge more for an adult eating a child's meal or just serve the meals to everyone. I do accept that there would not be much profit in serving children's meals to a table of 6 adults though, they are usually relatively cheap.
I do find it frustrating that any eating establishment has this rule, however. Many people for various reasons can't eat a full sized meal or simply prefer 'childrens' food'. Perhaps the answer would be to charge more for an adult eating a child's meal or just serve the meals to everyone. I do accept that there would not be much profit in serving children's meals to a table of 6 adults though, they are usually relatively cheap.
-- answer removed --
This was doing the rounds on FB yesterday, if what I read was true (not just about the fishfingers) then it seems he was discriminated against. With regards to the fishfingers though, I think they were very, very petty, shame on them.
Macdonalds don't make sure you have kids with you to buy a Happy Meal.
Macdonalds don't make sure you have kids with you to buy a Happy Meal.
Octavius
\\\\I don't understand why she would want to treat him like a child by ordering from the childrens menu.\\\
Exactly.......but.....would they then have said"My 47year old was treated as a child because he had Down's Syndrome."
It would seem that the disability of Down's syndrome had nothing to do with the issue.
\\\\I don't understand why she would want to treat him like a child by ordering from the childrens menu.\\\
Exactly.......but.....would they then have said"My 47year old was treated as a child because he had Down's Syndrome."
It would seem that the disability of Down's syndrome had nothing to do with the issue.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.