­
Police Issue Second Mugshot Of Convicted Female British Isis Terrorist... in The AnswerBank: News
Donate SIGN UP

Police Issue Second Mugshot Of Convicted Female British Isis Terrorist...

Avatar Image
naomi24 | 12:21 Thu 20th Feb 2025 | News
21 Answers

...after she complained that first picture showed her without a head covering.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14398893/Police-mugshot-ISIS-terrorist-picture-British.html

 

They aim to please.  

Gravatar
Rich Text Editor, the_answer

Answers

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Perlease, they shouldn't be walking about like a pillar box anyway.

From the report this terrorist w-h-o-r-e was preparing to leave this country with her kids and go to Afghanistan.Why the heck did they stop her?It would have saved us a lot of dosh rather than keeping her in a life of comfort for the next forty years.And she and her brood would have found out what an Islamist state is really like.

crazy isnt it ynnafymmi.

But fret not one of 2TK's HRA mates will be along soon to sort it out, and get a council house a motor and regular dosh I am sure.

 

Saw that. Bleeding ridiculous. They need to throw out all this woke garbage, ideally starting last decade.

If you scroll down the link you will see her house in Stratford upon Avon. The police shouldn't have taken a the second photo, they should have enlarged the first one.

Of course what she didnt realise is that now her 'real' picture is spread all over the place - forever!

Thick as well as dangerous.

the covered up picture was a joke - right?🤣

(can bank robbers have their mugshots in balaclavas?)

And this is how the police react when their stupidity is pointed out:

"West Midlands Police said it was ‘common practice’ to take more than one custody image of a suspect if that person had ‘some kind of accessory’ on their face, such as glasses."

So now, covering your face entirely apart from a slit for your eyes (in the style practiced by bank robbers and street muggers) is viewed in the same light as wearing a pair of glasses. Priceless!

Talking about police idiocy, came across this, this morning.

 

?si=trLl6wfNhTkTl31O

sensible puppy!🤣

Of course what she didnt realise is that now her 'real' picture is spread all over the place - forever!

yeah I wonder which one the police will  use !

The niquab should be banned in public - and, yes, I'm using English spelling - this is Britain after all and q is followed by u.

I've not forgotten the shock of opening the staffroom door to a niquab-clad 6th former who I remembered as a perfectly nice, pleasant girl from the term before.

 

how did the puppy upset muslims?

TTT  going back some years now to when I and another teacher took our (very well-behaved dogs on a walking outing with upils (100% Muslim) the children were, at first, terrified of them and asked it we knew the parents of the dogs.  On being assured of that they gradually relaxed and all was well - the kids fighting to be allowed to hold the leads by the end of the day.

Dogs are held to be evil by many Muslims.

so the mere fact that there was a puppy ad upset them? Really, sorry that video is 10 mins can't be arised to watch that can someone give me the gist.

It was a new campaign by Dundee police and it featured a puppy sitting in a police officer’s hat.

It “triggered anger” amongst the Muslim community because Islamic teaching warns them against contact with dogs because they are seen as “impure”. Some shopkeepers refused to display the posters and Councillor Mohammed [who else?] Asif suggested the campaign was a waste of resources.

Tayside police issued a statement saying they did not consult their “diversity adviser” before launching the campaign and apologised for any offence caused.

Old Geezer i couldn't believe the video ,how ridiculous that the police apologised for that !!!!

This country is getting more and more ridiculous!!! (Will I get a jail term for saying that?)  Why do we have to allow other cultures to not abide by our rules when we take it for granted we must abide by rules when in other countries?  I have always thought it wrong that we must wear crash helmets but THEY can wear turbans and, on the score of crash helmets we can't wear them in shops to hide our identity when THEY can go in in complete disguise?!!!  Rant over.

They're making a rod for their own back.

Aren't they showing disrespect for Islam?

“Aren't they showing disrespect for Islam?”

No. I’d say instead that followers of Islam are showing disrespect for the culture and customs of this country.

Its institutions should not be expected to be aware of, let alone pander to the foibles of every lunatic religion that unfortunately has been allowed to proliferate within these shores.  

Keeping a dog as a pet and using them as working animals is a perfectly normal part of life in the UK. There are about thirteen million of them. If Muslims don’t like them or are prohibited from interacting with them by order of their religion, that is there problem, not that of everybody else.

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.

Complete your gift to make an impact