ChatterBank5 mins ago
Banned questions about Impostors
57 Answers
I have had five of ma last seven questions in Suggestions Banned. Four of those Banned were about Impostors. Is that just co-incidence or are we not allowed to discuss the matter in public?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by THECORBYLOON. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Think it's the 2nd option :-(
the other BOO. posted earlier and said (on here) that he (she?) had done the name as a stand against impostors. Why they chose my name, I've no idea, I asked em but the question didn't last 5 minutes- lol. Don't think they being malicious towards me though, so I'm not gonna kick up a fuss about it.
the other BOO. posted earlier and said (on here) that he (she?) had done the name as a stand against impostors. Why they chose my name, I've no idea, I asked em but the question didn't last 5 minutes- lol. Don't think they being malicious towards me though, so I'm not gonna kick up a fuss about it.
According to the rules, this question (and possibly TheCorbyLoon's account) should be deletd as well:
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/AB-Suggestions/ Question295509.html
Chris
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/AB-Suggestions/ Question295509.html
Chris
On Monday, Miss Ed wrote �� I would like to encourage you to use this category only for AB suggestions.� Which seems to be different fae ABE's declaration.
The Impostors situation has been dragging on and on and there appears to be no resolution to it. I am drawing it to others' attention when I spot it and what happens is I get ma post pulled. There seems to be something wrong somewhere.
The Impostors situation has been dragging on and on and there appears to be no resolution to it. I am drawing it to others' attention when I spot it and what happens is I get ma post pulled. There seems to be something wrong somewhere.
Evening Loon how's you?
I think that the dear old site has been in trouble for a while now with imposters and trolls, marlboro junkies and suchlike. The old Ed didn't want to address it, and nearly banned me when I pointed out the problems of it on here, and the new Ed is exactly that. New. It's hard to judge whether they just want things out of the limelight whilst they deal with them, or if like our dearly departed American Ed, this one doesn't give a stuff either and just ants to gag those of us that do.
I think that the dear old site has been in trouble for a while now with imposters and trolls, marlboro junkies and suchlike. The old Ed didn't want to address it, and nearly banned me when I pointed out the problems of it on here, and the new Ed is exactly that. New. It's hard to judge whether they just want things out of the limelight whilst they deal with them, or if like our dearly departed American Ed, this one doesn't give a stuff either and just ants to gag those of us that do.
i am new to the site though have browsed many times previously and have seen the ongoing discussions about imposters
apart from that i have also noticed that a few users seem to use several aliases-seemingly to provoke argument or make chat-which i recently felt compelled to bring to the editors attention
apart from that i have also noticed that a few users seem to use several aliases-seemingly to provoke argument or make chat-which i recently felt compelled to bring to the editors attention
So I take it you have emailed the Ed on this matter, nickmac?
Very interesting.....
I've only been here since beginning of June, and only know of peeps with more than one username, when they have declared it...quite often it is because there has been a glitch or a temporary ban, that they find the need to have an additional name...
Very interesting.....
I've only been here since beginning of June, and only know of peeps with more than one username, when they have declared it...quite often it is because there has been a glitch or a temporary ban, that they find the need to have an additional name...
a wise user studies the form before beginning to post, and some who don't immediately attract criticism for not doing so. Seem a bit harsh to criticise nickmac because he/she has done so.
According to the previous editor's warning, it's not just TCL's post that may be banned, but TCL himself; on the other hand, he may be only potentially banned, which is perhaps less painful.
According to the previous editor's warning, it's not just TCL's post that may be banned, but TCL himself; on the other hand, he may be only potentially banned, which is perhaps less painful.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.