Road rules3 mins ago
Dear Ed. Please read
72 Answers
I have devised a top 4 things that will make this site a darn site better. Please be good enough to answer upon your return as to why they can not be implemented.
1) Anybody who is abusive for NO reason gets banned. This does not include people responding to foul abuse on here. But I am referring to those who constantly quote other people for no reason or post an answer that is just plan rude. I am all for argument in politics etc, but personal insults and following people around is bang out of order. Further I am all for free speech which will cause a small degree of ill feeling, but when somebody just writes "Shadow Man is a knob cheese" in a discussion about new Plasma TV's, is this acceptable?
2) Only one user name per ISP. The few, and I stress very FEW people who have partners and children on here who use the same computer will seek special dispenation from yourself.
3) The my profile time to be changed. I know if I have answered a question as it is there but the time shown reflects your own answer. I want to know if anybody has added since my post, so the time shown should be the last time added by anbody NOT the owner of the profile.
4) When you check your own thread, the sysytem loses all its own paragraphs. So you have to re-line all your own work when maybe all you have done is corrected a word.
Rather simple requests considerring you have your own tech team. I am no computer expert, but I am certain these simple changes can be implemented. The site is excellent but has become ruined by complete tw4ts who ruin it for everybody. And this has extended beyond just B and S.
1) Anybody who is abusive for NO reason gets banned. This does not include people responding to foul abuse on here. But I am referring to those who constantly quote other people for no reason or post an answer that is just plan rude. I am all for argument in politics etc, but personal insults and following people around is bang out of order. Further I am all for free speech which will cause a small degree of ill feeling, but when somebody just writes "Shadow Man is a knob cheese" in a discussion about new Plasma TV's, is this acceptable?
2) Only one user name per ISP. The few, and I stress very FEW people who have partners and children on here who use the same computer will seek special dispenation from yourself.
3) The my profile time to be changed. I know if I have answered a question as it is there but the time shown reflects your own answer. I want to know if anybody has added since my post, so the time shown should be the last time added by anbody NOT the owner of the profile.
4) When you check your own thread, the sysytem loses all its own paragraphs. So you have to re-line all your own work when maybe all you have done is corrected a word.
Rather simple requests considerring you have your own tech team. I am no computer expert, but I am certain these simple changes can be implemented. The site is excellent but has become ruined by complete tw4ts who ruin it for everybody. And this has extended beyond just B and S.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Shadow Man. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Booster Girl, show me one post where I have been abusive for no reason (not argumentative, or bigotted) but abusive. Further, show me where I have ever mentioned any other user in a question to invite an argument.
Show me these and you have my word and my honour I will donate �10,000 to a charity of your choice, such is my confidence.
Show me these and you have my word and my honour I will donate �10,000 to a charity of your choice, such is my confidence.
Grrrr, it looks like it's been removed so I can't provide the URL for it, but it was the one by a certain ABer in The Reef, where you immediately launched into an attack without provocation, well not on that thread anyway.
Aint getting at you honest, I was equally as bad on that thread- but i'm not the one who's now whinging ;-)
Aint getting at you honest, I was equally as bad on that thread- but i'm not the one who's now whinging ;-)
No Booster Girl (sound of a klaxton bell) WRONG.
This was in response to him for no reason saying I stalked a little girl and tried to rape her of something. I ignore 5 people on here, I mean completely ignore.
Even today in B and S one of the peasants has a little dig. Not a major one and not worthy of retort.
I am never abusive for abusive sake. I swear to God.
This was in response to him for no reason saying I stalked a little girl and tried to rape her of something. I ignore 5 people on here, I mean completely ignore.
Even today in B and S one of the peasants has a little dig. Not a major one and not worthy of retort.
I am never abusive for abusive sake. I swear to God.
wardy you wrote the following about me in this thread http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question45 8857-2.html
"What a stupid man you are. I have never hidden. It is people like you that give the scotch a bad name. you are an ill-educated, try hard who frankly deserves to die a horrible death with your foul anti-British views.
It is not my fault you are an under-achiever. Blame your equally foul parents, not the world!!!!"
Does the �10,000 donation apply to everyone?
"What a stupid man you are. I have never hidden. It is people like you that give the scotch a bad name. you are an ill-educated, try hard who frankly deserves to die a horrible death with your foul anti-British views.
It is not my fault you are an under-achiever. Blame your equally foul parents, not the world!!!!"
Does the �10,000 donation apply to everyone?
WARDY when asked for a motto for the UK you gave the following
Freedom
Utopian
Cosmopolitan
Kind
Equal
Delightful
Unpatronising
Pretty
Wondeful
Ingenius
Thoughtful
Happy
Marvellous
Unselfish
Splendid
Loving
Interesting
Mesmerising
Sensational.
I wrote
All those words wardy and none apply to you (Yes I have reported it)
You wrote
Oh no, I have been reported by a scotch peasant. How will I ever cope?
Pathetic.
I wrote
The words may be fabulous but it's another pathetic offensive posting by wardy
Wardy wrote
I wish I had the gumption to not only type your name in bold but to underline it as well. Then, and only then, may I look equally as ridiculous.
But to offend a ned, is really not that hard is it?
I wrote
I do it for a reason whereas you look ridiculous no matter what you post and no matter what Bowie-related name you hide under
Freedom
Utopian
Cosmopolitan
Kind
Equal
Delightful
Unpatronising
Pretty
Wondeful
Ingenius
Thoughtful
Happy
Marvellous
Unselfish
Splendid
Loving
Interesting
Mesmerising
Sensational.
I wrote
All those words wardy and none apply to you (Yes I have reported it)
You wrote
Oh no, I have been reported by a scotch peasant. How will I ever cope?
Pathetic.
I wrote
The words may be fabulous but it's another pathetic offensive posting by wardy
Wardy wrote
I wish I had the gumption to not only type your name in bold but to underline it as well. Then, and only then, may I look equally as ridiculous.
But to offend a ned, is really not that hard is it?
I wrote
I do it for a reason whereas you look ridiculous no matter what you post and no matter what Bowie-related name you hide under
I am confused by the sequence of replies on this question, why have you (shadowman) put that comment about joe the lion, it does look as though you have signed in as someone else and inadvertently put a reply to your own question. I might be incorrect there but it just reads quite oddly.
However it does not detract from that silly reply from bowiefreak- there is no reason to wish that on anyone even in jest.
However it does not detract from that silly reply from bowiefreak- there is no reason to wish that on anyone even in jest.