I wonder whether it has occurred to the Editor that the very people most likely to vote FOR keeping ChatterBank are the same ones who have multiple user-names! Doesn't it seem rather like the old joke about the Irish politician? He urged his constituents..."Vote early and vote often!"
It's pointless having the vote anyway (even though I did), we all know that it won't live beyond the week- some folk won't be able to stop themselves and the plug will be pulled from it.
Hi Quizzy Long time no see, hope you are OK. Is this hatterbank so I can ask about you? I admit to having a couple of usernames but only for emergencies and would never insult or degrade another person. I don't suppose this Chatterbank will be any different from the last disaster as there appears to be some really horrible people on here. But it's nice to have somewhere where we can ask others how they are doing.
ive no doubt that cb will stay.
as ive said its a cynical ploy by ab ed to relocate folk from body n soul .
if they shut cb then it will just continue on body n soul.
if you cant se that youve still got your eyes shut.
The vote is a close run thing at the moment but I do agree with you QM.
Also, if Chatterbank is being brought back in an attempt to return Body and Soul to its original purpose, does that mean if Chatterbank is not a success over this coming week, that 'chat' will be banned from Body and Soul?
Interesting. If at the end of a week there is a vote in favour of rejecting Chatterbank, will they pull it ?
It's back after absolutely categorical denials from the ED that it would ever be revived. Why ?
To me anyway, it makes absolute sense to keep it. There has been far far more trouble and of a more vicious kind in B&S since Chatterbank was last closed. Closing CB won't change human nature.
But whiffey that was a different Ed altogether, this one seems much nicer and hands on than the last one, who didn't stay long and never commented upon anything.
Another thing. Can 'greenies' vote? Can the Ed or the techies see who has voted? If yes to both, then I would suggest that the 'green vote' be taken with a pinch of salt. I can foresee quite a few new accounts being set up (both in the 'for' and 'against 'camps) to try to sway the vote.