As there are two AB Editors

[TCL-MUMPING]

can ONE of yous reply to THECORBYLOON's e-mails? It's not much to ask is it?

[dot.hawkes]

your post from last night has vanished BTW, why donlt you ring them, i have before now, not had a great deal of success emailing.
oh the phone number seems to have gone from the profile page, i'll try to find it

[kjc]

What makes you think that you are entitled to an answer from the ED.
I expect your e-mails are exactly like your posts here on suggestions.................demanding this and demanding that.
I have heard that the ED does not go in for being shouted at, and told what to do.
Are you asking the ED to re-instate you? what sort of tone of voice are you using?
Messages from the ED in the past have included............'We do not have to give an explanation for the ban'...............'Our decision is final'.........................

It seems that you have annoyed him somewhat, and no ammount of pleading from you, or anyone else is going to bring you back.
Give it up as a bad job. I would.

[chinadog]

I have to speak as I find. I find TCL most helpful and friendly. He's assisted me well on behalf of my daughter. I hope the ED will reply to one of his e mails.

[TCL-MUMPING]

kjc these are the two e-mails I sent

13.12. 08 �As you have said 95% of ma posts are aimed at the Editors and contain nothing more than rants you will, of course, have the evidence to substantiate this claim. I would be grateful therefore if you would provide me with a copy of this evidence.

I would also be grateful if you would explain why you failed to reply to the five e-mails I sent to you asking why I was singled out in a previous thread

Many thanks

THECORBYLOON�

Followed by one on 14.12.08

�Are you in a position to respond to the e-mail below?

THECORBYLOON�

Hardly �demanding� is it?

[weeal]

I hope the ED does reply to TCL, he does have a point and deserves a reply. Not only that but he was trying to save the ED's ass with a thread which was removed ... by the ED.

[Ethel]

There is no contract between you and the editors or this site - you are not owed anything and I am sure you know you are once again breaching the Site Rules by creating another id to get round the fact you have been banned.

If the editors don't want to reply to you, there is nothing you can do except show your outrage by leaving the site altogether, never to return. That'll show them.

[Bathsheba]

Hi TCL. Ok, so help me out with this one. Why exactly is it so important to you to get your old name back, hun?
Everybody now knows who you are by your current name, so can't you just let it go? :-)

[legend.isgod]

Isnt it sinking in yet ?

As the ed has said previously he wont reply to emails.


What bit didnt u understand?

Seeems simple enuff to me m8


Best let it go .


But if u prefer to continue then knock urself out

[legend.isgod]

Re the name simply put a fullstopafter THECORBYLOON AND IT WILL LET YOU REGISTER


d t h?�?�

[LoftyLottie]

I remember that thread weeal. TCL pointed out that a thread which remained, even though it had been reported should be removed as for legal reasons it could jeopardise the site. It contained the names of the parents of Baby P.

I too think that TCL deserves a proper reply from the Ed. as to why his threads are being removed. The fact that TCL is moaning all the time is not a good reason to remove threads. TCL is only moaning because he can't get a reply.

There are lots of people that moan all the time. Moaning is not mentioned in the rules as a reason for being banned.

[weeal]

Yep lottie

A lot of people would do the same, just fighting for a reply, when he was in the right in the first place - not too much to ask is it.

[TCL-MUMPING]

legend on 11.12.08 in his e-mail to me the AB Editor said

"You have clearly ignored our warnings and advice (speak to me rather than post on AB Suggs) and thusly you have been removed from Answerbank."

I have spoken to him by e-mail but no reply.

As for the full stop, the limit is twelve characters which THECORBYLOON is already.

[Ethel]

There you are - that's all the reply you need.

The editors don't want you here.

[Bathsheba]

Well, drop the The then? x

[weeal]

Bath - you got a stutter? lol

[LoftyLottie]

Ethel, as I understand it TCL did try to speak to the Editor by email but he was ignored so tried another means, i.e. Suggestions, and then he got banned for not talking to the Editor by email.

As I see it, TCL has been banned purely because he speaks the truth and has criticised the editorial team. Poor show that the Editor can't take criticism.

Also, Ethel, you talk about breaching Site Rules. A huge amount of people on here breach the Site Rules and no action is taking. Why is one person singled out.

[Bathsheba]

LOL little un! xx

[TCL-MUMPING]

Ethel I am well aware there is no contract but consider this, had the AB Editor telt you that after looking at yir answers, 95% were giving misleading advice (for example) and you were being removed, would you not be asking for proof?

Bathsheba the AB Editor has made an allegation that "95% of (ma posts) are aimed at the
Editors and contain nothing more than rants" I am asking for evidence to substantiate it.

[Bathsheba]

Fairy Nuff, TCL- i understand why you're miffed xx