Donate SIGN UP

AB Poll

Avatar Image
TCL-MUMPING | 22:15 Fri 13th Mar 2009 | Site Suggestions
23 Answers
Despite being unwelcome as THECORBYLOON, I am receiving e-mails as if THECORBYLOON were a member of the AB community still and the latest one has a poll

"It has been claimed maternity services in England lack the quality of care required for new mothers and babies. Do you agree?"

One of the options is "Couldn't comment, I have never used UK maternity services"

It seems the writer of the question is confused since England is part of the UK and not THE UK. May I suggest the AB Editor get off Twitter, gen up on the UK and correct the question and/or the option asap.

Many thanks

TCL
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 23rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by TCL-MUMPING. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
he's not been busy on twitter today corby, he's been busy removing my 25,000 posts and 800+ questions all day as he has permanently banned me, see the div and knbend jump up and down in glee
is glee in tenerife?
Question Author
Why have you been removed?
Sorry TCL went to bed so missed your question, I personally think that the ed has set me up by ignoring my emails asking or help and support with the bullies and the abusive people like knobby and no-knowledge and legend, I believe the ed was just ignoring me and failing to do anything about them because I showed dissent at his ability to do his job. Then when I finally get pushed too far by knobby's abuse and vile comments. I retaliate in kind, pooofff, a reason for the ed to ban my id. He's banned that lot enough times, i guess I am just shocked that the ed chose to ban me rather than deal with the problem over the last few months. 25,000 posts gone, all because he could not address the issue and let them carry on, I am convinced that there has been a concerted effort to get me banned by their constant bating and goading. Some people are now supporting them because I dared to make comments about knobby's wife, well where was their support for me over the last few months when there was constant vile abuse going on? So much for it all being pixels eh? The ed has allowed this to happen and I assume he prefers the abuse on here rather than tackle it when it is reported.
well it would seem dots now had a pardon .

ive read shes had all her posts reinstated and her username.

surely now as a precedent has been set in reinstating her name then the corbyloon must also have all his useful answers ive read about reinstated.

ive said previously that he shouldnt have , as obviously there are rules for everyone.

but if dot has had hers reinstated i can see folk like the corbyloon having the same right.

perhaps theres been a policy or mood change within the editorial team.

i for one will be first to back tcl in his bid for equal treatment .


legend
Very well said legend.

I agree. But as I see it, dot has got her name back too.
TCL is a different name to the one he is using now. So if TCL is banned and can only post under his new name, then how can his original answers be reinstated?
Hi lexie, i do agree with the sentiment that Corbyloon should be reinstated, I am not 100% sure why i have come back, I have narrowed it down to the following, which may help Corbyloon in his on going campaign:

1) The ed made a mistake and was only intending deleting certain posts of mine but pressed the wrong button and it took a day to sort it out technologically.

2) The ed did not make a mistake but he thought it would be a good way to show me that he has the power and the technology and he knows how to use it.

3) The ed got sick of my deluge of irate angry and down right indignant emails and decided it just was not worth the hassle and reinstated me.

4) The spare ed came into work on Saturday and saw what the ed had done and read my continued barrage of emails and decided that I should be reinstated and has done that, in which case when the ed gets into work Monday and see what the sub ed has done he could throw a hissy fit and delete me again.

I know it also means that corbyloon should be able to be technically reinstated, as all the years of my postings had been removed, i think TCL should contact the ed again and suggest there is a lifting of his ban.
3) The ed got sick of my deluge of irate angry and down right indignant emails and decided it just was not worth the hassle and reinstated me.
.......................................................................
so now you admit to bullying the Ed
TCL have you tried bullying the Ed?
Lmfao at nokno



BULLYING SHOULDNT BE CONDONED.



Noknowledge maybe you can get reinstated too?


And doc spock too?




Where will it stop tho ?




Could this be the thin edge of thewedge?
If I remember correctly, legliar told TCL to shut his mouth and stop moaning. That was when he was doing his snivelling creep act to impress the Ed. Once again this scumbag has shown his many faces.

Good to see Dot Hawkes back and hopefully TCL as well. Another two excellent contributors should also be reinstated, Abdulmajid (his colour shouldn't matter) and Lucy Thomas, both sorely missed for their intellectual input. I'm sure the Ed will now reconsider his policy.
" surely now as a precedent has been set in reinstating her name then the corbyloon must also have all his useful answers ive read about reinstated.

ive said previously that he shouldnt have , as obviously there are rules for everyone. "


POsted earlier.

Always better if one reads the whole thread.

Bring back the corbyloon i say.

and did at 10.31 am this morning



silly sewerdk you arent very clever or youd have realised .


lol



lol


lol













btw



?�?� DID I LOL ?�?
I have just found an email from the spare ed regarding my banning on friday, the first part is a polite but stern telling off for being quite angry in my emails to the ed, but this is an interesting response as to why i was banned, and possibly could be why Corbyloon has gine too:

I was confused to why you were banned when I logged on Friday evening. I
> am only a Spare Ed after all. The conclusion we have come to is that we do
> not know why you were banned. No-one seems to have done it manually. The
> system may have, it seems, �cocked up.�
>
> The machinery which runs AB towers is old and held together with rust. I
> have tried to Un-ban you but I cannot be sure if it has worked. I wondered
> if you could try logging in?
>
> All the best,
>
> - The Spare Ed.
...so it doesn't have loads of flashing coloured lights then... another illusion shattered...
-- answer removed --
lol, it would seem not, just a few ropes and chains by all accounts, very medieval, I kinda like that though : ))
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
knock yourself out knobby. lol
Question Author
It would appear that dot was removed in error whereas THECORBYLOON was removed on purpose.

The reason has yet to be substantiated because the AB Editor can not back up his reason wi ANY evidence whatsoever
well if an abusive dot can be reinstated

as the above post shows ^^^^^^

and doc spock has been reinstated too


then why not the loony from corby??


free the loony i say


nowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

1 to 20 of 23rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

AB Poll

Answer Question >>