His postings were:
40% intelligent
40% humorous
20% involving personal persistent abuse beyond general acceptability with scant disregard of the rules.
He was banned for the 20%
Me? couldn't understand his threads anyway, those long stupid gaps with DTH at the bottom drove me mad..................but hey! there are many people that I drive mad.
He's a funny man. He's had everyone in my house laughing. How he comes across in real life and how he 'sometimes' comes across on here are completely different.
ummmm....morning my love......yepp you are quite correct, I bet many people on AB would have a shock if indeed they met their adversaries in real life.
People for lunch today ummmm, can't stand my routine being disturbed.
Ola Sqad !!
He is one of the kindest funniest people you would wish to meet -just a shame that he was the epiphany of 'give a dog a bad name'.Lots of peeople who complain about him then have to admit that they actually have no problems themselves with him.I rest my case.
You obviously didnt try your bedside manner on your missus this morning cos not only would you have your breakfast -you would have had it in bed :) x
No, no leggy, the sexual and urinating tales were part of a scientific study of abnormal sexual relations i.e what is, or what is not sexually normal...............;-)