ChatterBank5 mins ago
"ladies" Day At The Grand National, Photographers Could Be Banned.
51 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-30 14124/P hotos-f inished -Aintre e-set-B AN-phot ographe rs-taki ng-pict ures-ba dly-dre ssed-wo men-Gra nd-Nati onal-me eting-a void-em barrass ing-pic tures-l ike-the se.html
/// 'We have talked about trying to monitor those photographers, so if we see any element clearly looking for a negative shot and we can identify that, we will take their accreditation off them and we'll kick them off the site. ///
/// 'That's not easily manageable, but that's what we'll endeavour to do.' ///
Why kick the photographers off the site, why not kick off the offending "Ladies"?????
/// 'We have talked about trying to monitor those photographers, so if we see any element clearly looking for a negative shot and we can identify that, we will take their accreditation off them and we'll kick them off the site. ///
/// 'That's not easily manageable, but that's what we'll endeavour to do.' ///
Why kick the photographers off the site, why not kick off the offending "Ladies"?????
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Not snobby Schweik - I regard you as the essence of the thinking worker.
SOme of them seem not to be badly dressed but more not fully dressed.
There is one showing her bottom without a pair of knickers. A thnking man like er Scweik might well exclaim - my god that girl needs TWO hair styles!
there is another who is struggling to keep her dress down like Marilyn Monroe on the street grating, the diffference is that Marilyn was fully dressed
I mean if I went the Grand national wearing that girls missing knickers I would get chucked out wouldnt I ?
SOme of them seem not to be badly dressed but more not fully dressed.
There is one showing her bottom without a pair of knickers. A thnking man like er Scweik might well exclaim - my god that girl needs TWO hair styles!
there is another who is struggling to keep her dress down like Marilyn Monroe on the street grating, the diffference is that Marilyn was fully dressed
I mean if I went the Grand national wearing that girls missing knickers I would get chucked out wouldnt I ?
The Daily Mail never misses an opportunity to print pictures of drunken fat sl@gs, bless'em.
Obviously photographers are there to record the event, and if that includes anyone misbehaving, then that is their job. I agree with AOG, if the organisers want to stop pictures that make their event look down market, they should steward the event properly, and remove ladies (and men) who are worse for wear with drink.
Obviously photographers are there to record the event, and if that includes anyone misbehaving, then that is their job. I agree with AOG, if the organisers want to stop pictures that make their event look down market, they should steward the event properly, and remove ladies (and men) who are worse for wear with drink.
It makes me laugh at the sheer unintelligent of some anti-Daily Mailers, when they criticise the Mail for showing pictures merely to titivate their readers.
How else would any paper be able to report on the fact that photographers may be removed from the site, for taking certain photographs, if they didn't produce examples of the type of photographs they mean?
How else would any paper be able to report on the fact that photographers may be removed from the site, for taking certain photographs, if they didn't produce examples of the type of photographs they mean?
AOG - // It makes me laugh at the sheer unintelligent of some anti-Daily Mailers, when they criticise the Mail for showing pictures merely to titivate their readers.
How else would any paper be able to report on the fact that photographers may be removed from the site, for taking certain photographs, if they didn't produce examples of the type of photographs they mean? //
Indeed - so we have a Catch-22 in operation.
The Mail publishes pictures of ladies the GN would prefer not to have bandied about, to highlight a news story in which photographers are taking pictures like this - to sell to the Daily Mail!
How else would any paper be able to report on the fact that photographers may be removed from the site, for taking certain photographs, if they didn't produce examples of the type of photographs they mean? //
Indeed - so we have a Catch-22 in operation.
The Mail publishes pictures of ladies the GN would prefer not to have bandied about, to highlight a news story in which photographers are taking pictures like this - to sell to the Daily Mail!
The women in these pictures probably do not realise that National Hunt racing is predominantly a winter sport. When the Aintree Festival takes place the weather can be hit or miss and so the summer dresses always seem out of place to watch horses run around a sometimes very muddy track. You can see the darker clouds in one of the pictures.
Why did the Guardian need to print a photograph of a baby being breast fed, was that also for the titillation of their male readers?
http:// www.the guardia n.com/c ommenti sfree/2 015/mar /27/im- not-a-n ipple-n azi-im- a-breas tfeedin g-couns ellor
http://
AOG - //Why did the Guardian need to print a photograph of a baby being breast fed, was that also for the titillation of their male readers?//
Unlikely - The Guardian doesn't really attract the same prurient readership as The Mail.
Personally I see no need for the picture of the baby feeding - just tell me the story is about a baby breastfeeding, and I'll know what it's about, I don't need a picture to help me out.
But any Picture Editor knows that a photo underlines the impact of a story for a specific readership which is why they (including the Mail) - put them in the paper.
Unlikely - The Guardian doesn't really attract the same prurient readership as The Mail.
Personally I see no need for the picture of the baby feeding - just tell me the story is about a baby breastfeeding, and I'll know what it's about, I don't need a picture to help me out.
But any Picture Editor knows that a photo underlines the impact of a story for a specific readership which is why they (including the Mail) - put them in the paper.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.