ChatterBank3 mins ago
The Turner Prize?
10 Answers
What do you think of it?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Stargazer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Where is the politicking?
They said they wanted to speak out in "an era marked by the rise of the right and the renewal of fascism in an era of the Conservatives' hostile environment that has paradoxically made each of us and many of our friends and family again increasingly unwelcome in Britain".
I prefer watercolour landscapes personally.
They said they wanted to speak out in "an era marked by the rise of the right and the renewal of fascism in an era of the Conservatives' hostile environment that has paradoxically made each of us and many of our friends and family again increasingly unwelcome in Britain".
I prefer watercolour landscapes personally.
Is this art or are they 'Installations'?
Installation is just about the most pretentious word to pass off any old tat as 'art' there has to be.
Art, of course, is subjective, but for me the 'art' in the Turner Prize is just self-indulgent rubbish. No doubt this makes me a luddite.
Take Martin Creed - I mean really, how are we meant to take this seriously...
"Creed’s art is characterised by a gentle but subversive wit and by a minimalism rooted in an instinctive anti-materialism. His often extremely self-effacing works, all titled by number, such as Work No.79 1993, ‘some Blu-Tack kneaded, rolled into a ball and depressed against a wall’, or Work No. 88 ‘a sheet of A4 paper crumpled into a ball’,"
A sheet of A4 paper crumpled into ball is 'art'? In which case, I manage to produce art most days of the week!
https:/ /www.ta te.org. uk/what s-on/ta te-brit ain/exh ibition /turner -prize- 2001/tu rner-pr ize-200 1-artis ts-mart in-cree d
As for the quote in Shoota's post.....well, they're idiots, aren't they.
Installation is just about the most pretentious word to pass off any old tat as 'art' there has to be.
Art, of course, is subjective, but for me the 'art' in the Turner Prize is just self-indulgent rubbish. No doubt this makes me a luddite.
Take Martin Creed - I mean really, how are we meant to take this seriously...
"Creed’s art is characterised by a gentle but subversive wit and by a minimalism rooted in an instinctive anti-materialism. His often extremely self-effacing works, all titled by number, such as Work No.79 1993, ‘some Blu-Tack kneaded, rolled into a ball and depressed against a wall’, or Work No. 88 ‘a sheet of A4 paper crumpled into a ball’,"
A sheet of A4 paper crumpled into ball is 'art'? In which case, I manage to produce art most days of the week!
https:/
As for the quote in Shoota's post.....well, they're idiots, aren't they.