Are Our Judges Fit For Purpose?

[davebro3]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13875417/ugandan-killer-murdering-man-wont-deported-judge-rules-breach-human-rights.html

You just couldn't make it up!

[1ozzy]

Or should your post read "are our laws fit for purpose"

Judges don't make the laws, they uphold them.

So who's to blame?

[1ozzy]

Well, you could make it up Dave, any other fake news to post?

[davebro3]

"other fake news" implies that THIS is fake news - is it?

[youngmafbog]

Our judges and law, keep your Ozzy nose out.

It does beggar belief Davebro, country is no longer ours.

[youngmafbog]

No Davebro, he's probably had too many tinnies again.

[1ozzy]

Possibly not fake, but, definitely bovine excrement.

Judges pass their judgement based on the law, not on some *** opinion of what should have happened. 

Soz ***😏

[1ozzy]

//Our judges and law, keep your Ozzy nose out.//

My most sincere apologies😆

😁😇🤣

[davebro3]

So any murderous thug who can convince the docs that he's a bit mental can get a judge to rule it's against his human rights to be sent back to his own country?

As I said - you couldn't make it up.

[davebro3]

I wonder what the Ozzies would do...

[1ozzy]

//So any murderous thug who can convince the docs that he's a bit mental can get a judge to rule it's against his human rights to be sent back to his own country//

Apparently so, but it's not the judge that should be judged for the decision, it's the law that the judge has to abide by!

Is this really difficult to understand ?

😏

 

[1ozzy]

We would abide by the law that was in place at the time Dave, and not moan incessantly,,,

[davebro3]

It wasn't "the law" - his lawyers "successfully argued" it would be against his human rights - the judge could equally well have determined that their argument WASN'T successful.

[1ozzy]

But the judge didn't!!

Does that possibly educate yourself in how the law works Dave?

Asking for a friend that thinks you're full of yourself.

[davebro3]

Exactly - the judge made a judgement (it's what they do). In a case like this the judgement could have gone either way - he was probably worried that if he ruled for deportation there would have been an appeal further up the chain - possibly to the ECHR (& no one wants that do they!).

I suppose the scumbag will spend the rest of his miserable life sucking on the UK benefits system having already enjoyed years of free bed & board.

[1ozzy]

Possibly, just possibly the judge based their judgement according to the law, not your warped interpretation there of Dave.

Oh, if only you could don a wig and say " me lord, I wish to"

Be a ***🙄

[Untitled]

"he was probably worried that if he ruled for deportation there would have been an appeal further up the chain - possibly to the ECHR "

why would a judge be worried about this?

[davebro3]

Because it drags out the process & makes him look bad if he is subsequently overruled. Easier just to give in....

(the Ozzies wouldn't be cowed by the thought of the ECHR waiting in the wings would they - the sooner we get out of t the better)

[CrapatCryptics2]

Its time they rewrote the human rights laws to state that those infringing others human rights ie by killing them etc should lose that protection.

[ToraToraTora]

Usual ordure from the glaikit ozzy. If it was black and white we would not need judges. This is a typical trobiscite deeming that the yuman rites of low life criminal scum out weigh the rights of the rest of us. We need to introduce our own version of the ECHR based on common sense.