Family & Relationships0 min ago
Please switch off automatic censorship within links
2 Answers
AB, quite reasonably, has software which deletes 'naughty words'.
AB's software also detects links, so that it can highlight them and make them 'clickable'.
Is there a way of getting these two systems to talk to each other so that 'naughty words', which happen to appear within links, aren't deleted?
For example, I included a link here which happened to include the letters y and i, followed by d. The censorship software obviously thinks that I'm being anti-semitic!:
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Travel/Question 358728.html
I usually read through my posts after sending them and I'm also experienced enough to suggest a way for readers to get around the problem. However, many posts from other people have been rendered entirely meaningless when their links have been destroyed by AB's 'over-zealous' censorship software.
Chris
AB's software also detects links, so that it can highlight them and make them 'clickable'.
Is there a way of getting these two systems to talk to each other so that 'naughty words', which happen to appear within links, aren't deleted?
For example, I included a link here which happened to include the letters y and i, followed by d. The censorship software obviously thinks that I'm being anti-semitic!:
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Travel/Question 358728.html
I usually read through my posts after sending them and I'm also experienced enough to suggest a way for readers to get around the problem. However, many posts from other people have been rendered entirely meaningless when their links have been destroyed by AB's 'over-zealous' censorship software.
Chris
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Buenchico. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If this site must use censor-bots because of the inability of some AB Users to conform to the Site Rules then I would suggest that the preview screen should reflect the censorship which is applied to the submitted post, thus allowing the poster to identify, and where necessary change, rogue vocabulary.
I'm not certain that an exemption should apply to URL text as this could then be open to abuse, in two senses of the phrase.
I'm not certain that an exemption should apply to URL text as this could then be open to abuse, in two senses of the phrase.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.