ChatterBank6 mins ago
your you're to too grrrrrrrrr!
24 Answers
why do so few people, lots around AB, seem not too know the difference between your and you're? is it to much trouble too learn in the first place? You're answers are welcome.
(please don't pick me up on my mistakes they are a joke or possibly hyperbole )
(please don't pick me up on my mistakes they are a joke or possibly hyperbole )
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by timwoowoo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It also irritates me to see "your" and "you're" mixed up.
However, we have to accept that English is constantly changing, and also that many changes come from the United States.
On UK message boards "your", as short for "you are", is still unacceptable by those who treasure the English language. However, US message boards seem to be accepting "your" as a suitable abbreviation. I predict that it will eventually be accepted by US educators and, later, by the OED.
As an analogy, most Brits still refer to a TV "programme" but happily accept that PC software is a "program". I wonder how long it will be before we accept the US spelling universally?
Chris
PS: Slightly off-topic, but I do find that spelling errors can conjure up some interesting pictures in my mind. At the school I used to teach at, there was a filing cabinet drawer labelled "PE stationary". Now that really is a whole new concept in education ;-)
However, we have to accept that English is constantly changing, and also that many changes come from the United States.
On UK message boards "your", as short for "you are", is still unacceptable by those who treasure the English language. However, US message boards seem to be accepting "your" as a suitable abbreviation. I predict that it will eventually be accepted by US educators and, later, by the OED.
As an analogy, most Brits still refer to a TV "programme" but happily accept that PC software is a "program". I wonder how long it will be before we accept the US spelling universally?
Chris
PS: Slightly off-topic, but I do find that spelling errors can conjure up some interesting pictures in my mind. At the school I used to teach at, there was a filing cabinet drawer labelled "PE stationary". Now that really is a whole new concept in education ;-)
I believe it is something to do with people thinking about how the word sounds, not how it looks. There is a sort of quiz I have seen that asks you to count the number of "f"s in a passage. Some people do not count the ones in "of" because it sounds like "v". Same kind of thing I suppose.
Running about equal with "your welcome" is "loose the way". Easily done, if you think how you pronounce "hose" it is no wonder that "lose" so often gains another "o".
Running about equal with "your welcome" is "loose the way". Easily done, if you think how you pronounce "hose" it is no wonder that "lose" so often gains another "o".
I complained a while ago about 'nothink', which is not just said by people who really ought to know better (ie BBC newscasters), but is also spelt the same. One might expect certain people to say 'nuffink', but it's so annoying to see it spelt incorrectly too. Perhaps it's all down to the autocue writers? It seems well on the way to universal acceptance.
I believe stationery shops were originally ones that settled down in a particular area - around the printing quarter, which in London was St Paul's - rather than going round the country to all the fairs and market days. Somewhere along the line the word acquired two spellings. So maybe modern writers are just reuniting them.
Pretty close, Jno; "stationery" dates from as early as the 14th century. At that time most retailers were itinerant or market traders, and of the few permanent shops that existed the majority were booksellers. Hence "stationery" was stuff you bought from such a permanently stationed shop. The Company of Stationers, a Livery Company looking after the interests of the sellers of books and writing materials, was founded in the 16th century. However, that does not excuse the confusion between the "-ery" of the noun and the "-ary" of the adjective. (I know you weren't suggesting it did!)
Thanks all for lively debate, I posted this and then wasn't around to join in.
I always remember being told stationery has an e for envelope, nice and easy but is it pronounced en-velope or on-velope? My dad always said on-velope but then he was of a generation that also said an 'otel and indeed wrote an hotel.
I find 'phone naked without the apostrophy but phone seem to be okay these days.
I always remember being told stationery has an e for envelope, nice and easy but is it pronounced en-velope or on-velope? My dad always said on-velope but then he was of a generation that also said an 'otel and indeed wrote an hotel.
I find 'phone naked without the apostrophy but phone seem to be okay these days.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.