Film, Media & TV8 mins ago
Glasgow attack - The US knew 2 weeks ago...
Apparently, the US knew about the threat to Glasgow Airport 2 weeks ago, but failed to pass on the info.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml =/news/2007/07/02/nterror1102.xml
And now Brown is carrying on where Blair left off.
Any connection?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml =/news/2007/07/02/nterror1102.xml
And now Brown is carrying on where Blair left off.
Any connection?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Gromit
Authorities monitoring terrorist suspects are flooded with what is known as 'chatter'. It's the background noise which often disguises real information and it often difficult to distinguish what is real and what is 'chatter'.
There are literally hundreds of lines of chatter which have to be filtered every day. There's no reason to believe there was anything suspicious in the failure to pass the information on.
Authorities monitoring terrorist suspects are flooded with what is known as 'chatter'. It's the background noise which often disguises real information and it often difficult to distinguish what is real and what is 'chatter'.
There are literally hundreds of lines of chatter which have to be filtered every day. There's no reason to believe there was anything suspicious in the failure to pass the information on.
-- answer removed --
During the first world war, my children's great grandmother and her elderly parents were rounded up and interred in a stadium as they were foreign nationals and the country was at war, they were held at White City Dog Track, she had been born in Fulham, her parents were from Sax -Coberg. They and thousands of others across the UK were kept in detention for the sake of national security, there was a huge camp up in lancashire near Newton-le-willows too, it was an order the Government made to protect it's people and it's service,men. It is a historical fact.
The US is hotly denying this. Any 'information' about what intelligence services know or don't know is to be taken with a pinch of salt; a lot of turf war, ass-covering and downright lying can be involved. And as sp1814 says, they get to hear so much chatter they can construct a case for anything at all - especially retrospectively.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.