ChatterBank0 min ago
Rudjard Kipling
5 Answers
Why did he have such an affinity withe British Tommy please?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by druiaghtagh. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.His son was a soldier who died in WWI, it was a TV drama starring Daniel Radcliffe.
http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt0851430/
The below link is quite interesting...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudyard_Kipling#E ffects_of_World_War_I
http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt0851430/
The below link is quite interesting...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudyard_Kipling#E ffects_of_World_War_I
Though his support of the'Tommy' went back a long way before the Great War. He wrote two collections of poems published as " Barrack Room Ballads" in 1890 and 1896.He writes from the viewpoint of the ordinary soldier and often uses the vernacular language of the men
The poem "Tommy" is an example of how he tried to change the public perception of the ordinary soldier. In it the soldier speaking says that he couldn't get served in a pub, because they 'didn't want no Tommies', but goes on to note that their attitude is completely different when there's fighting to be done! Something suggests that Kipling didn't like hypocrisy!
Why did he think that way? Well for one thing,unlike his readers, he had been in India, at the height of British rule, in quite a lowly job as a newspaperman, and had witnessed the virtues (and vices) of all classes there, first hand. He was sensitive to injustices.He came to respect the ordinary soldiers as human beings.He wasn't one who thought that status, class and upbringing automatically made someone better, worse or morally different.
The poem "Tommy" is an example of how he tried to change the public perception of the ordinary soldier. In it the soldier speaking says that he couldn't get served in a pub, because they 'didn't want no Tommies', but goes on to note that their attitude is completely different when there's fighting to be done! Something suggests that Kipling didn't like hypocrisy!
Why did he think that way? Well for one thing,unlike his readers, he had been in India, at the height of British rule, in quite a lowly job as a newspaperman, and had witnessed the virtues (and vices) of all classes there, first hand. He was sensitive to injustices.He came to respect the ordinary soldiers as human beings.He wasn't one who thought that status, class and upbringing automatically made someone better, worse or morally different.
The Kipling Society website is
http;//www.kipling.org.uk
and 'Tommy' is here (you may have to click on to 'poem' to avoid the editor's 'notes'):
http://www.kipling.org.uk/poems_tommy.htm
http;//www.kipling.org.uk
and 'Tommy' is here (you may have to click on to 'poem' to avoid the editor's 'notes'):
http://www.kipling.org.uk/poems_tommy.htm
erm I have noticed MustafaTickls quote
Thing is the British massacred the Sudanese in a series of battles = with a very high kill ratio (sudanese to British). Their gri-gri's clearly not working. [In a CSI episode, Grissom finds a gri-gri: I nearly dropped dead when I heard it]
so it is a bit ironic to say that the average Tommy respected them.
Thing is the British massacred the Sudanese in a series of battles = with a very high kill ratio (sudanese to British). Their gri-gri's clearly not working. [In a CSI episode, Grissom finds a gri-gri: I nearly dropped dead when I heard it]
so it is a bit ironic to say that the average Tommy respected them.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.