Crosswords4 mins ago
Language evolving or degenerating?
42 Answers
I've always been pedantic about getting the english language correct. I know that 'language' is an organic thing that, by it's very nature, evolves. Let's face it, we wouldn't like to be talking middle english to our friends! But where do you draw the line between evolving and degenerating? Do we give in to the abuse people make of apostrophes? Do we accept bad spelling caused by people's slovenly articulation? I love the variety of colloquialisms but should there be golden rules that we never break? Perhaps you have your own favourite words and phrases that are peculiar to your location? I have only taught english at junior school level and wouldn't purport to be an expert by any means, but I do love my mother tongue, with all its richness and I am fearful of its deterioration. What do you think?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Tups. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Totally agree with you there Tups, I take it you read the press reports about some english professor who suggested that we demand too high a standard from our school children over spelling and grammar, and should let the language evolve so that such mistakes as "there" instead of "their" or even "they're", should become accepted! I'm all for informality on sites such as this, I use text abbreviations (when texting!) and I'm certainly no expert in grammar, but I do get cross with bad spelling and punctuation.......and have probably made loads of grammatical errors while writing this!
-- answer removed --
When I used to write English reports, we were made to use a capital E for the subject title then use a lower case e when talking about someone's use of english. Perhaps a peculiarity of our head teacher (or would you rather, Head Teacher?). I did say I'm no expert and I think with the changes we are seeing and accepting these days, it's hard for anyone to be one.
By the way Tups, if you're interested in local phrases etc, there's a book "Talking for Britain" which is great to dip into, also I'd recommend the novel "Ella Minnow Pea", can't recall the authors name at the mo, but its about a very well educated society who suddenly find they are allowed to use less and less letters of the alphabet when they talk or write to each other!
-- answer removed --
I agree with Tups and ET.
Languages DO evolve, but I think the degeneration of the written word's down to the use of text speech, abbreviations by folk who perhaps can't pronounce the initial words - and ignorance in general.
I laughed like a drain at ET's irritating examples.
"Could of, would of, hadn't of......" Grrrr!
It doesn't matter so much on sites like this, and, as with MSN, we all know that they have a keyboard language of their own - lol - but I just prefer to see things written properly when it comes to formal letters and such.
Languages DO evolve, but I think the degeneration of the written word's down to the use of text speech, abbreviations by folk who perhaps can't pronounce the initial words - and ignorance in general.
I laughed like a drain at ET's irritating examples.
"Could of, would of, hadn't of......" Grrrr!
It doesn't matter so much on sites like this, and, as with MSN, we all know that they have a keyboard language of their own - lol - but I just prefer to see things written properly when it comes to formal letters and such.
".....I've always been pedantic about getting the english language correct. ........."
That doesn't sound right? Did you mean to say "I've always been pedantic about using the English language correctly"
Me too, it seems to be in-bred in me though I do 'lighten up' in fun.
I do abhor corrections on here.....but couldn't resist this time!
That doesn't sound right? Did you mean to say "I've always been pedantic about using the English language correctly"
Me too, it seems to be in-bred in me though I do 'lighten up' in fun.
I do abhor corrections on here.....but couldn't resist this time!
the language will change whether we like it or not. Spelling is already so out of sync with pronunciation that people find it difficult to cope - I know the difference between there, their and they're, but the fact is they are all pronounced exactly the same, so it's logical if people use the same spelling for all three, even if it's wrong. Logic is not something to be sniffed at; I wish there was more of it in the language.
My current pet peeve is underway, which should be two words; it seems to have come under the influence of words like motorway and undertake (and such parallels do influence the way words are spelt). But in 20 years I expect underway to be normal and 'correct'.
My current pet peeve is underway, which should be two words; it seems to have come under the influence of words like motorway and undertake (and such parallels do influence the way words are spelt). But in 20 years I expect underway to be normal and 'correct'.
There is no such thing as "correct English".
We have "Fowler's common usage" not "Fowler's correct usage".
I'm sure that some people from the time of the King James' Bible would think our language has degenerated because we don't use thee and thou and don't distinguish between singular and plural of what is now "you".
There is a risk but it's not that standards are falling in our eyes that people are using the language in different ways from the way we were taught was "right".
The risk is of fragmentation. Language is after all about communication. If it evolves differently in different communities in the UK then that communication will become impared.
Think about how hard it can be to understand a Glaswegian or Geordie. Now imagine dozens of different dialects.
I think we're a long way from that now after all we can still understand most Americans and Australians but it is more important than just worrying that people will do things differently from like what we was taught
We have "Fowler's common usage" not "Fowler's correct usage".
I'm sure that some people from the time of the King James' Bible would think our language has degenerated because we don't use thee and thou and don't distinguish between singular and plural of what is now "you".
There is a risk but it's not that standards are falling in our eyes that people are using the language in different ways from the way we were taught was "right".
The risk is of fragmentation. Language is after all about communication. If it evolves differently in different communities in the UK then that communication will become impared.
Think about how hard it can be to understand a Glaswegian or Geordie. Now imagine dozens of different dialects.
I think we're a long way from that now after all we can still understand most Americans and Australians but it is more important than just worrying that people will do things differently from like what we was taught
I too am slightly concerned over English teachers being unconcerned about spellin mistake in childrens' work. I know this is true as my eldest daughter still can't spell for toffee and we were told this whenever we contacted school about this concern.
Are we soon going to have a generations who spell words differently? How confusing will that become?
Are we soon going to have a generations who spell words differently? How confusing will that become?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.