ChatterBank2 mins ago
NHS & non-essential operations
Forgive me if I'm wrong but is the current national news item even newsworthy or is it just designed to cause political discomfort?
The way I read the situation is that an elderly, very unfit woman is complaining that a non-essential, non-life-threatening operation has been cancelled [presumably for good reasons] even after being advised that her chances of surviving the op are only put at 50%. Am I wrong?
Any comments most welcome.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by ianess. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Exactly what I said to my wife last night. She's alive isn't she? Maybe if she saw it like she's possibly saved 7 lives instead of the me, me, me attitude.. I must say I'm very disappointed in Mr Howard. But then again, they all do it. Anybody out there worth voting for? Andy Hughes I reckon. Seems like a sensible, level headed, honest chap.
According to the paper between 2002/3 to 2003/4 the trust employed 6 more dentists and doctors 54 less nurses, midwives and health visitors, closed 2 intensive care beds but employed 78 more administration staff.
Yes this surgery is non life threatening, but she is in intense pain and has been for several months, imagine a broken leg or arm not in plaster!, I would have thought that the trust would have requested a nearby trust to treat this woman if they were unable to, but that would cost her trust money and might mean one less new administrator
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.