@Notafish. In my opinion, as a diagnostic tool for determining a food allergy, the IgG test has no value.
Even an IgE test is not absolutely specific. Let me give you an example. If we were to perform the IgE test for peanut allergy on a random 100 people from the street, we would expect a positive result in 8 out of every 100. But not all 8 will actually have an allergy to peanuts. In fact, it is estimated that peanut allergy affects only around 1% of the population, or 1 in every 100 of people randomly selected.
So perhaps you can begin to appreciate the problem, There is currently no single simple diagnostic blood test that can offer a clinically significant result.
Food allergies are best tested with the rather labourious and time consuming "food challenge" tests, backed up with various diagnostic blood tests if and when an allergy or an intolerance is detected, and a family history and personal medical history are probably the most important bits of information.
A quite sensible link for you notafish:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/03/19/148950092/to-find-out-about-food-allergies-first-use-the-right-test
From the article,
"An article in the current Canadian Medical Association Journal reminds doctors that IgG tests aren't reliable tests of food allergies.
It follows the guidelines on diagnosing food allergies from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease in 2010, which lumped IgG testing with more than a dozen "nonstandardized and unproven procedures" that should be avoided. A positive IgG test, the expert panel said, could cause people to avoid foods that they can safely eat"
There remains a gulf of misunderstanding between the general public and medical professionals about how and why food allergies and intolerances affect us. Even amongst medical professionals there is some confusion.
This gulf of misunderstanding in the perception of what is a food allergy or intolerance is best illustrated by the % of people who are convinced they suffer from such a disorder, and the actual % of the population who can demonstrate clinically that they do in fact have such a problem.
The immune system is often thought of by members of the public as a kind of personal defence system which works in a manner analogous to a sort of simple muscle response. It is far far more complicated than that, and it is actually a very unhelpful misperception.......