Donate SIGN UP

Ed, Whats going on?

Avatar Image
yogi-bear | 09:27 Mon 22nd Nov 2010 | Editor's Blog
53 Answers
Morning Ed,

I've just perused some of the threads this morning from over the weekend and it appears ummmm and docspock have been suspended. Surely this a mistake and maybe they got caught in some sort of crossfire over the weekend. Can you please look into this and let us know what happened.
I cant see anything why they would have been suspended for.........and Docs christmas video is absolutely superb, albeit a bit early, the lovable old twit.......lol

We're talking about two of the nicest people on AB here, Ed, so this has to be an error surely?.

Cheers and kind regards.

yogi :0)
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 53rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by yogi-bear. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Umm was suspended for nasty comments.

Doc was suspended for spamming.

Nothing to do with how nice they are the rest of the time, or how good one of Doc's videos is.

So no, it isn't an error. The rules apply to everyone.

They have however, if you peruse the bullies, spammers & reporters thread just been released.

Spare Ed
ooohh, I always miss the juicy stuff on here. Doc can't be suspended! I say we protest!
Question Author
Thanks Ed for the clarification......doc always like to have his '5 in a row', and means no harm, but i get your point.

Regards

yogi
morning yogi i have just seen ummmms name on another post think shes back on now !!!
Question Author
Morning honey,

Yep, she appears to be back, which is cool :0) x

The Ed is really fair, zzxxee and has good sense to make the right decisions, when he looks at a situation.
I would exactly call my comments nasty. Especially when it comes to Wagner...

Jayne understood.. :-)
welcome back ummmmm
OMG ...

Was ummmm suspended for what she said to me ?

=0(

Now I feel bad.

Yes, ummmm had a little pop at me, but I was winding everyone up about Wagner.

There were no bad feelings afterwards.

I'm sure it won't be the last time that ummmm and I have a difference of opinion. There are lots of things on which we don't see eye to eye. Lots !!!

But ... we don't get mardy about it, and we don't sulk afterwards.

Well, we're pals again now ... until our next tiff, ha ha ha, LOL !!

=0)
well said jj x
Ummmm was wrongly reported after one of her posts was mistaken to mean something else by another member ... he did apologise when he realised his error.
Can't 'undo' the submit button, I guess?
Whilst I know that "rules are rules" ...

Before seeing the red mist, and reporting regular users, maybe we should take a moment to think ...

"Was that really nasty? Or is it just a bit of cut and thrust?"
may be regular users should take a minute before they post nasty comments etc in case
they are taken the wrong way and reported
JJ the only time I would report someone for having a pop at someone other than me would be if I thought that the poppee was seriously hurt by it...not enraged but hurt.
Ha ha! The poppee!! I love that. :o)
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. I never thought I'd see that demonstrated in a place like AB.
... not forgetting ''bullying will thrive where management is weakest''.
I missed it all as per usual, glad to see everyone is back to normal
Naomi :-)
are you saying the Ab Ed/Spare Ed is corrupt sandy?
In one of his posts over the weekend docspock described the Pope thus, "I will never understand anyone who feels they have to be led by this aged pervert in a white frock and silly hat." Anyone who had half a brain might have reflected, before typing, that this might cause great offence to catholics and non-catholics alike.

1 to 20 of 53rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Ed, Whats going on?

Answer Question >>