Sexual predators who abuse children

[dave50]

A lot of sexual predators who abuse children seem to have had not much physical experience with women of their own age or any lasting relationships. Does anyone think that any men who live on their own or with their parents and seem to have no interest in the opposite sex should be viewed with suspicion? I would have thought that the vast majority of men would need a sexual outlet of some kind, if not women then what? Not my view but something that was suggested to me the other day.

[jackthehat]

Do you have the statistical analysis to hand?

Or should we just save time and chemically castrate/imprison the men you describe?

[China Doll]

I think a view like the one you suggest would be considered particularly ignorant and ill informed so I'm jolly glad it's not your view because I wouldn't like to think there were people that stupid taking up oxygen space.

[penelope2]

Females are also sexual predators.

[mccfluff]

so my very good friend who lives at home with his parents (as buying a house is too expensive) is painfully shy and a complete and utter IT geek (his words). i should be viewing him with suspicion should i??

whoever suggested it to you is an idiot

[Booldawg]

'see that man up at number 32? pervert 'e is! lives on 'is own he does! gotta watch yer kids round 'im! been livin' on this estate 30 I 'ave. Seen 'is type before.

[Baldric]

Ball cocks!

[sunny-dave]

All men need a motorbike - any man who doesn't have one should probably be viewed with suspicion. Without the 'normal' outlet for his biking tendencies he is probably abusing mobility scooters in Sainsbury's car park.

Hmmm ...

[DTCwordfan]

oh please, dave, how down market is that. You must shag Harleys in Waitrose carparks.

[FredPuli43]

It's probably right to say that such offenders have arrested development, have never advanced to the maturity of a normal man and therefore prey on girls who are beyond puberty and mature in a strictly physical sense, but not otherwise, and who are therefore both vulnerable and not threatening to them'

True paedophiles,men whose sexual fantasies and desires are directed at children below the age of puberty, have perverted sexual development.

Both categories are, thankfully, rare, and directing our attention to men of the description given in the OP would be fruitless, since only a minute percentage would be inclined to the offences and large numbers outside the description are so inclined.

[Booldawg]

I've got a bicycle, am I only viewed with slight suspicion? nice one though - Orange hardtail - pimped out with lots of upgrades.

[friedgreentomato]

Dave that is such an ignorant view and shows how little you know on the subject.

[sunny-dave]

Oy - which dave????

[jackthehat]

And, it's not really 'News' although, granted, there isn't a designated topic for 'ill-conceived nonsense of a slightly sinister nature'.......

[mccfluff]

you - of course

[sunny-dave]

Bog off purple pants

[ummmm]

Shocking attitude.

Do you know dave50 that lots of paedophiles out there are actually married? Do you know that some men abuse their own children?

[mccfluff]

bog off yourself saggy aging yellowing yfronts

oooo do you think that's another group that should be viewed with suspicion... of crimes against washing machines

[jno]

my parents did regard unmarried older men with some suspicion and would occasionally warn us to be careful around X or Y. Their suspicions never proved to be justified, but I think it's a reasonable approach for cautious parents to take and I've never thought the worse of them for it.

Did other people's parents not do the same? I'm surprised.

[Frank97]

As a single, middle aged man, who lives on his own, I find the thought that I should be viewed with suspicion as highly offensive!