Why

[TWR]

Is there so much nastiness going on, on this site of late? just looking at Andy / AOG reply to each other after a miss understanding, they have put their differences to one side & resumed their AB relationship as contributors to the site, but then it starts with a petty few that likes to keep sticking in the knife like my Granddaughter sucking a lollipop, for gods sake grow up "You Few" do you get enjoyment in your sad life that you have nothing better than to keep turning the screw? I've had my share on here with a few, how to handle it, Ignore them, that seems to annoys them more, it's a good job the Web is vast & you can look elsewhere for enjoyment rather that looking at children bicker, if you can not get enjoyment out of your life, go and see your GP, you have a problem.

[Sqad]

\\\\if you can not get enjoyment out of your life, go and see your GP, you have a problem.\\\

I know and I agree....but I can't get an appointment.

[baza]

Well said.

[mazie]

This site is like a convent compared to what it was a few years back TWR. Thank goodness for that :o)

[mazie]

LOL sqad xx

[-Talbot-]

Why are some posters trying their damnedest to get other poster in hot water?

[Baldric]

Good question ^^ Bill!

[TWR]

As said the "Few"

[Prudie]

I agree with mazie's comment but let's be honest TWR, have you any idea how unbelievably boring it would be on here if there weren't some spats and disagreements?

[Baldric]

How do you define Nastiness TWR, is it someone who does not share you point of view, or do you have some other criteria?

[TWR]

Prudie, I do understand the So Called Spats, but there is no need for the Unnecessary Childish snide remarks that come from the same quarter time after time, do these idiots realise that there are people out here that these sort of snide remarks can effect them? I have worked supporting people that have been victims of few that think they are clever but in fact they need help not encouragement.

[Baldric]

'Your' not you^^^^^^

[-Talbot-]

We all know how beneficent you are TWR, there is no need to keep repeating it.
Have you got certain ABers in mind who need treating with kid gloves?

[RandyMarsh]

Conflict is part of life.

[Psybbo]

Yes Mick, some of us are sensitive souls, so stop stirring!

[DTCwordfan]

Mick has a biblical heart of stone, when it comes to matters such as this, Psybbs (waves hi x) - he's probably a counsellor to the Devil.

[Mamyalynne]

I think the 'Hand of friendship' thread ticked along quite well really.

[Psybbo]

Waves back, DTC x

[mikey4444]

TWR...I agree with you 100%. I have been out at work all day and I was appalled but not so surprised to see that the debate started by Andy's apology early this morning is still going on. Not so much still going as still going around in circles.

I expect that Andy wished he had never apologised in the first place. AOG has responded well, so thanks to him for that.

Some people on here just seem to enjoy being as nasty as possible, and its about time Ed started dealing with the problem. I can't go back as far as Mazie, but it really must have been awful, if it was worse than now !

I also agree with TWR about the ignoring...it really does annoy them more !

[Svejk]

^pmsl

[andy-hughes]

mikey - "I expect that Andy wished he had never apologised in the first place. AOG has responded well, so thanks to him for that."

No, I don't regret that, I felt better when I had posted it, and better still when AOG replied in the same spirit.

We have both been amazed that the thread has ticked over all day, but I am sure it will die a natural death, as all threads do, and we will all trot along to the next one.