Question Author
@Old_Geezer
My 05:48 and 05:51 were stacked on top of each other when the page reloaded after posting the second one.
Not for the first time, the forum software has inserted a post, albeit chronologically correctly, your 05:49, in between them, now that I tevisit the thread.
A very fast-growing thread the other day (an AOG special) was playing tricks like this. It pays to re-scan the most recent dozen posts to see what has been added upstream of where you've read to.
//Reference to non-lying faiths risks setting up a reference to lying-faiths, and the unreasonable implication that religions are all liars. I'm sure you'll want to make clear that, that isn't the intent.//
That's a twist I hadn't anticipated. And you have twisted my words there. I have not asked which faiths are lies, or which are lying or non-lying, as you put it, I asked which of them -prohibit- lying.
It didn't even make the final cut for the Ten Commandments, did it? I guess it is trivial compared to the rest but it is a thing which niggles at me.
You can watch some religious debate show and the Moslem spokesperson gets pinioned over an unpleasant edict and their first words are always "no, you've got that wrong, it is about...(xyz)" but, at the back of my mind is what Svejk pointed out in the first reply.
Sophistry in business dealings is advocated as well as in matters of faith, when dealing with infidels, such as us.