Road rules1 min ago
Varieties Of Religious Experience
21 Answers
Have been (re)reading this book by William James. I think that I know the general concensus of ABers re: religious/spiritual experiences but as it seems a human thing to have transcendental experinces just wondered how you all interperate this phenomena?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by nailit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Link to the whole thing here:-
http:// www.gut enberg. org/fil es/621/ 621-h/6 21-h.ht ml
I stopped reading at the phrase "There can be no doubt that as a matter of fact a religious life, exclusively pursued, does tend to make the person exceptional and eccentric."
I think that sums it up.
http://
I stopped reading at the phrase "There can be no doubt that as a matter of fact a religious life, exclusively pursued, does tend to make the person exceptional and eccentric."
I think that sums it up.
Hi Mikey / nailit
Is this any use https:/ /en.m.w ikipedi a.org/w iki/The _Variet ies_of_ Religio us_Expe rience
Is this any use https:/
Ha ha obviously not - I just read until I hit that phrase then stopped because it roughly agreed with my pre-existing beliefs.
The brain is quite capable of generating 'experiences' or perceptions that something is 'true', or 'happening' that are not shared by the brain next to it, and if religion is that brain's 'thing' then those experiences may be tailored around that and if not then maybe those experiences will be about aliens invading or something else equally convincing.
The brain is quite capable of generating 'experiences' or perceptions that something is 'true', or 'happening' that are not shared by the brain next to it, and if religion is that brain's 'thing' then those experiences may be tailored around that and if not then maybe those experiences will be about aliens invading or something else equally convincing.
The brain has a brainstorm, then wants to make sense of it, so it invents a divine cause, because it can't be anything else, or so the brain rationalises. What people think must be a religious experience can all too often be an episode of temporal lobe epilepsy. And yes, you can have only one such episode in a lifetime. Study temporal lobe epilepsy, then look at the biblical story of St Paul's conversion. You'll see powerful resemblances.
atatlanta: As a Christian I dispute I have temporal lobe epilepsy! Your argument means that love, pity or hatred has a cause not of the rational mind. You can't say that 'religious' experience comes from irrationality but other 'reasoning' does not. How can you differentiate differing received experience? If that is the case we are wasting our time communicating because any objective reasoning is illusory. My religious experiences have been just that, experiences as real as walking down a cobbled street or falling in love. Our experiences as 'religious' can only be objectively considered as valid as the non-religious, otherwise you are saying that experience is only valid if it accords with your perception of reality which, in metaphysical terms, is simply that - perception. If I experience a religious 'event' you term it a brainstorm. Yet if I experience physical pain you would not. It is sophistry and, literally, un-reasonable. It is, in my humble view, also insulting to maintain my reality is somehow inferior to yours.
I know my unreligious mother had an odd thing happen to her once. She was inside the synagogue where she's gone to retrieve something someone else had left there and experienced what she described as a sort of epiphany and it quote distressed her because she couldn't rationalise it. She has not 'caught religion' since but she still acknowledges it as something strange and not of her controlling and it still makes her feel uncomfortable.
Scooping, //You can't say that 'religious' experience comes from irrationality but other 'reasoning' does not. How can you differentiate differing received experience?//
A good question, so why do you attribute what you call ‘religious’ experience to religion? Is it because you have pre-conceived notions, perhaps? It’s a bit like people who say they’ve seen or heard ‘ghosts’. Many consider that to be a religious experience, whereas the truth, although currently unexplained, might be very different.
A good question, so why do you attribute what you call ‘religious’ experience to religion? Is it because you have pre-conceived notions, perhaps? It’s a bit like people who say they’ve seen or heard ‘ghosts’. Many consider that to be a religious experience, whereas the truth, although currently unexplained, might be very different.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.