Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
The Hunger Games - Possible Spoiler.
10 Answers
I have watched the first film a few times, but I'm puzzled by the use, or more accurately, absence of cannons when Tributes die.
If they are fitted with trackers that register when their hearts stop, why don't the cannons sound every time a Tribute dies - it seems some get a 'bang' and some don't.
I'm not sure of names, but when the black guy killed the girl who was about to kill Katniss, no cannon sounded, but when he died that night, a cannon sounded, and his image was flashed on the night sky.
Similarly, when Boo died, no cannon.
It doesn't detract from my enjoyment of the film, but has anyone else noticed these anomalies?
If they are fitted with trackers that register when their hearts stop, why don't the cannons sound every time a Tribute dies - it seems some get a 'bang' and some don't.
I'm not sure of names, but when the black guy killed the girl who was about to kill Katniss, no cannon sounded, but when he died that night, a cannon sounded, and his image was flashed on the night sky.
Similarly, when Boo died, no cannon.
It doesn't detract from my enjoyment of the film, but has anyone else noticed these anomalies?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by andy-hughes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If you Google 'assumed detail' - and I did because I don't know what it means, you will discover that Google doesn't know either!
I can take an educated guess at what it means, but it doesn't satisfy my point.
If you set up a premise that, when a character dies a cannon sounds, then it's not a huge leap in terms of budget or film time, to provide consistency throughout the film.
I don't want to 'presume detail', in this case, I want to hear it.
I can take an educated guess at what it means, but it doesn't satisfy my point.
If you set up a premise that, when a character dies a cannon sounds, then it's not a huge leap in terms of budget or film time, to provide consistency throughout the film.
I don't want to 'presume detail', in this case, I want to hear it.
Arksided - // As they weren't 'Main' Characters maybe they just got edited out. with the boomth. //
Again, not an especially valid supposition.
If a character is supposed to set off a cannon sound effect by dying, then make it all of them or none of them - making it some and not others is a niggling and needless distraction.
Again, not an especially valid supposition.
If a character is supposed to set off a cannon sound effect by dying, then make it all of them or none of them - making it some and not others is a niggling and needless distraction.
TTT - // Andy, I made that phrase up, I don't think it's a recognised term but many films cut detail that the view can assume. Eg In T1, the terminator kills 3 Sarah Connors before becoming the "phone book killer" - but we only actually see 1. Are you suggesting some other reason? //
It is an excellent phrase, and admirably sums up the concept you outline.
I do understand that, for example, if you see someone start to dial a number on a phone, you don;t have to stay with them while they dail all the digits and wait for a connection, you can cut away and start the conversation.
But I do believe that in this instance, such a simple plot device should have been carried through, only because it is so absolutely simple to do, and in a film that has such an excellent creation of a dystopian society, this seems a pointless omission that irked me a little, and maybe others.
I shall watch it again though - the cosmic gorgeousness of Elizabeth Banks will take my mind of the absent cannons!!
It is an excellent phrase, and admirably sums up the concept you outline.
I do understand that, for example, if you see someone start to dial a number on a phone, you don;t have to stay with them while they dail all the digits and wait for a connection, you can cut away and start the conversation.
But I do believe that in this instance, such a simple plot device should have been carried through, only because it is so absolutely simple to do, and in a film that has such an excellent creation of a dystopian society, this seems a pointless omission that irked me a little, and maybe others.
I shall watch it again though - the cosmic gorgeousness of Elizabeth Banks will take my mind of the absent cannons!!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.