Quote:
"Epidurals have been around a long time, but it only became feasible to provide them widely for pain relief in labour once a suitable local anaesthetic, called bupivacaine, became available in the UK in 1968"
Other links I've found (but which are a bit to generalised to link to any specific one) seem to suggest that the two things go hand in hand. i.e. As soon as it became available, bupivacaine got used to block pain in the birth process regardless of whether it was a natural birth or a Caesarean one.
Squad is right. I had one in 1983. It went wrong. They hit a nerve in thespine which caused dreadful pain which made me scream. I lost feeling in my legs and it didnt numb my tum. I ended up with a general anaesthetic. I believe it was a a first attempt by the young Indian lady anaesthetist. An awful experience. My son will be 40 in may!
Sqad, my daughter was born in 1982 by Caesarian. My wife had an epidural, was awake (she laughed all the way through and said it felt like somebody was washing up in her tummy) and I was sat beside her, at the top end.
Wife also had one in 1983 which didn't work properly. Only one side went numb so they had to resort to a GA. They got me all gowned up ready to be in there with her then when they had to change to a GA they told me I had to leave. She got an infection in the wound which meant going back in to theatre later in the night for more treatment and left her with a weakness in the scar.
It seems my wife had it very easy.
I'm asking because my daughter was told this week that she must have been one of the first to be born that way but at the time it was suggested as routine to us. It wasn't a planned C section, either - we were hoping for a home birth
My earlier post said I agree with Sqad. I didn't see he said LATE 80s. Perhaps he meant late 70s.
In recent years I had to have a repair to an incisional hernia caused by that operation!