Will You Be Shopping At Boots This...
News0 min ago
Any other Rebus fans seriously disappointed by last night's Rebus? I always thought Ken Stott would make a good Rebus and as a TV drama it was very good, but seemed to bear no relation to the book it was 'based on' (The Falls). The storyline bore almost no resemblance to what happened in the book. Although Stott's acting was excellent, Rebus also was unrecognisable - a big football fan? Sketching his lover as she lies in bed? Doing something as soppy as taking her to the empty Hibs stadium? He was far too happy go lucky and smiley and nice for Rebus I thought.
Anyone else agree - or disagree - with me?
Wasn't sure whether to post this in TV or here, but anyway..
No best answer has yet been selected by morg_monster. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It is a long time since I read the book 'The Falls' but still thought that it wasn't the same story - for instance, where were the falls after which the book was named?
I expected some differences - the omittance of 'side' plots - due to the time limit but didn't expect such a difference.
As for the character himself, I thought he was good. Rebus has a very wry sense of humour which seemed to be well shown.
We were very disappointed in this new series, although we thought Ken Stott was nearer to Ian Rankin's Rebus than John Hannah. The story was completely different. Nancy Banks Smith in the Guardian was spot on with her comments: "Why buy Ian Rankin's The Falls and beat it around the head until the body can be identified only by the beer on its breath? It is one thing to tweak a story for TV. Quite another to rewrite it - admittedly write it quite well - with the murderer as the corpse and the corpse as the murderer and a wholly new storyline about incest."
The only thing which was the same as the book was the dolls in the coffins.