Uk Economy Is Headed For The Worst Of...
News5 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by derryman. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.i wonder if you have considered saving up for treatment, or persueing other avenues, ie fostering/adoption? I only ask because i cant really see when the nhs will have more funds available, as it is in such crisis treating ill people, and i would guess that whatever your personal views, fertility treatment would be somewhere near the bottom of the list of priorities at a time when so many nhs staff are being laid off.. People are waiting weeks and weeks for radiotherapy/chemotherapy treatment, and it's an age old debate in medical ethics really, that just because medical science can do something, does it mean there is an imperative to do it? It probably sounds very unsympathetic of me, i know, but i am just saying it might be best to proceed with the thought that the funding might not ever become available again, then you cant be disappointed. The discrepancy in the story in the paper, might mean something along the lines of the couple waited 16 months to even be seen, or for the clomid treatment.
I am only saying the above stuff because that is probably how the pct views fertility treatment in your area - as the bottom of a very long list with a very unfavourable cost/benefit ratio, and really i suppose that is how it should be