ChatterBank0 min ago
attractive or not really?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by unruliejulie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think you are generalising too much. I think in the main there is some fascination with the whole celeb thing - especially when they enhance themselves in the way that these 3 have - but I myself do not see the attraction. I might have found them more attractive without the big boobs (well Jodie Marsh - never), but again in a purely celebrity kind of way, as mentioned above, it's a fantasy. I much prefer a Kelly Brook, Uma Thurman or Cate Blanchett, but even they are probably cosmetically enhanced.
Women find men with fame, power and wealth attractive. This is why me, John Prescott and Sven Goran have so much luck with the laydees !
well to answer your question direct. No all that falseness is absolutely horrendous. Have you ever felt a fake fun-bag? Errggghhh feels like a water balloon. And ultimately I prefer brunettes.
Also, athough some women need a good slap of make-up to make them look half human, on the whole it is rather lower class and chavvy. A bit of eyeliner or whatever is fine, but when they look like coco the clown on a bad Sunday, well it's hardly attractive.
And further, to tell you the truth i really don't mind a bit of meat around the gills. Not too large but a something to get hold of is fine. I know little Kylie is waif-like, but as you say, the whole image is most stunning.
None of the men I know find the exaggerated features of Jordan, Jodie Marsh and Pamela Anderson attractive, but all go weak at the knees for Monica Belluci, Kelly Brook and Salma Hayek.
Personally, I prefer Saffron Burrows, but that's my Sapphic taste for you.